[2013] KEELRC 313 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 313 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's calculation of leave allowance was incorrect as it was based on a full month's salary for each year, whereas the court's calculation was based on 21 days annual leave, which is the correct statutory basis. The court also acknowledged an error in the addition of the total award and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELRC 313 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Jane Anseline Mwalishi Manono; Respondent: The Africa Labour Consultants Institute; Respondent: Bora Bora Hotel
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 63 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment Correction
Outcome
Judgment corrected to reflect accurate computation of compensation and total award.
Legal Topics
Terminal Benefits, Leave Allowance, Compensation Calculation, Judgment Correction
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Terminal Benefits Leave Allowance Compensation Calculation Judgment Correction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Anseline Mwalishi Manono

Claimant

The Africa Labour Consultants Institute

Respondent

Bora Bora Hotel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment Correction

  1. 1 Whether there was an error in the calculation of the claimant's terminal benefits, specifically the leave allowance and total award.
  2. 2 Whether the maximum compensation was correctly calculated as per statutory limits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's calculation of leave allowance was incorrect as it was based on a full month's salary for each year, whereas the court's calculation was based on 21 days annual leave, which is the correct statutory basis. The court also acknowledged an error in the addition of the total award and a mistake in the multiplication factor for maximum compensation, which should be 12 months and not 16. The judgment was therefore corrected to reflect the accurate computation of compensation and total award in accordance with the law and the evidence presented.

Court Disposition

Judgment corrected to reflect accurate computation of compensation and total award.

Orders

  • Compensation awarded at Kshs.93,053.
  • Total award corrected to Kshs.301,393.15.