[2016] KEELC 43 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff's evidence, which was uncontroverted due to the defendant's failure to appear or defend, established that the suit plot was given to the defendant by the clan to hold in trust for the plaintiff and her family. The plaintiff and her children have been in occupation of the land for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELC 43 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jane Kagio Kamara; Defendant: Muriithi Kamara
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 40 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff. Declaration of trust and rectification of register ordered. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- BN Olao
- Legal Topics
- Customary Trusts, Rectification of Register, Family Land Disputes
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Kagio Kamara
Plaintiff
Muriithi Kamara
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant holds plot No. 145 KAMUIRU in trust for the plaintiff and her children.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to rectification of the land register to reflect the trust.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff's evidence, which was uncontroverted due to the defendant's failure to appear or defend, established that the suit plot was given to the defendant by the clan to hold in trust for the plaintiff and her family. The plaintiff and her children have been in occupation of the land for decades, while the defendant resides elsewhere. The court held that the circumstances and evidence supported the existence of a trust, and it was appropriate to declare that the defendant holds the land in trust for the plaintiff and to order rectification of the register accordingly.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff. Declaration of trust and rectification of register ordered. No order as to costs.
Orders
- A declaration that the defendant holds plot No. 145 KAMUIRU in trust for the plaintiff.
- An order that the register be rectified to read that the defendant is registered as owner thereof in trust for the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KERUGOYA
ELC CASE NO. 40 OF 2016
JANE KAGIO KAMARA…………...……………….………….PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MURIITHI KAMARA………………………………….………DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff is wife to the defendant who is registered as the proprietor of land parcel No. 145 KAMUIRU which is a village plot. The plaintiff and her children have lived on the said plot (the suit plot) for over 40 years. The defendant has another wife with whom they live in Karaba area of Machakos County. It is the plaintiff’s case that the defendant holds the suit plot in trust for her. The defendant has recently started threatening to evict the plaintiff and sell the suit plot. That has necessitated the filing of this suit in which the plaintiff seeks the following orders:-
(a) A declaration that the defendant holds plot No. 145 KAMUIRU in trust for the plaintiff and an order be made to rectify the register to read the names of the plaintiff.
(b) Costs of the suit.
The defendant was served on 4th April 2016 with copies of summons to enter appearance, plaint, verifying affidavit and other documents. However, he has neither entered appearance nor filed any defence and on 21st June 2016 the Deputy Registrar at this Court entered interlocutory judgment against him and on 25th October 2016, the case came up for hearing before me.
The plaintiff’s testimony is that she is the second wife to the defendant and for the last 60 years, she has lived on the suit plot which is registered in the names of the defendant. The defendant has however moved to live in Mwea and his daughters have been visiting the land threatening her and her children. She therefore filed this suit. She added that the suit plot was given to the defendant by the clan.
The defendant having not entered appearance nor filed any defence to this claim, all that this Court can rely on is the un-controverted evidence of the plaintiff. The claim is based on trust and the onus is on the plaintiff to lead evidence to prove that the defendant holds the suit plot in trust for her and her children. This is because the Court will not imply a trust except to give effect to the intentions of the parties – MWANGI MBOTHO VS GACHIRA WAITIMU 1986 K.L.R 171.
In the circumstances of this case, the plaintiff’s evidence that the suit plot was given to the defendant by clan to hold in trust for her and the family has not been controverted. The plaintiff is also in occupation thereof together with her children while the defendant lives elsewhere with another wife. This Court has been asked to make a declaration that the defendant holds the suit plot in trust for the plaintiff and to order that the register be reflected accordingly. On the un-controverted evidence before me, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved her case against the defendant on the required standard.
Ultimately therefore, judgment is entered for the plaintiff against the defendant in the following terms:-
1. A declaration that the defendant holds plot No. 145 KAMUIRU in trust for the plaintiff and an order that the register be rectified to read that the defendant is registered as owner thereof in trust for the plaintiff.
2. No order as to costs.
B.N. OLAO
JUDGE
11TH NOVEMBER, 2016
Judgment dated, delivered and signed in open Court this 11th day of November 2016
Mr. Macharia for Mr. Ngangah for Plaintiff present
No appearance for the Defendant
Right of appeal explained.
B.N. OLAO
JUDGE
11TH NOVEMBER, 2016