[2011] KEHC 4222 (KLR)
The court found that while Section 29(4) of the Limitation of Actions Act appears to bar actions for damages in respect of a deceased person's death if not brought within 12 months, this provision is inconsistent with Section 4(2) of the same Act, which allows three years for actions founded on tort. The deceased...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 4222 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jane Muthoni Njiru; Applicant: Titus Njiru; Defendant: Muritu Kinyanjui; Defendant: James Kariuki Wanjau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 115 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- GG Okwengu
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Extension of Time, Fatal Accidents, Inherent Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Muthoni Njiru
Applicant
Titus Njiru
Applicant
Muritu Kinyanjui
Defendant
James Kariuki Wanjau
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can extend time for filing a suit for compensation for fatal injuries after the statutory limitation period has lapsed.
- 2 Whether Section 29(4) of the Limitation of Actions Act bars the applicants from filing suit after 12 months from the date of death.
- 3 Whether the court's inherent jurisdiction can be exercised to extend time in the interests of justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while Section 29(4) of the Limitation of Actions Act appears to bar actions for damages in respect of a deceased person's death if not brought within 12 months, this provision is inconsistent with Section 4(2) of the same Act, which allows three years for actions founded on tort. The deceased died on 13th March 2007, and the applicants sought letters of administration ad litem within the three-year period. The court held that it would be unjust to bar the applicants from pursuing the deceased's cause of action after only 12 months, especially as they acted within the three-year limitation for tort. Exercising its inherent jurisdiction to ensure justice, the court...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Time for filing suit for compensation for fatal injuries sustained by the deceased is extended.
- Applicants to file their suit within 60 days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT EMBU
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 115 OF 2010
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NOAH NDWIGA MOSES - (DECEASED)
JANE MUTHONI NJIRU..............................................................................................1ST APPLICANT
TITUS NJIRU...............................................................................................................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
MURITU KINYANJUI..........................................................................1ST INTERESTED DEFENDANT
JAMES KARIUKI WANJAU..............................................................2ND INTERESTED DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
1. Jane Muthoni Njiru and Titus Njiru hereinafter referred to as the applicants have come to this court ex-parte under Section 27 and 28 of the Limitation of Actions Act. The applicants are seeking to have time extended for filing a suit for compensation for fatal injuries sustained in a road traffic accident by Noah Ndwiga Moses (hereinafter referred to as the deceased). The applicants were granted letters of administration ad litem on 1st February 2010 but claim that they were not able to collect the grant until May 2010. The applicants therefore pray for extension of time.
2. I have given due consideration to this application. Under Section 29(4) of the Limitation of Actions Act, Section 27(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act which provides for extension of time is only applicable where the suit is an action for damages in respect of a deceased person’s death, if the action is brought before the end of 12 months from the date on which the deceased died. Thus the claim would be statute barred after 1 year from the date of the deceased’s death.
3. In this case the deceased is said to have died on 13th March 2007. Therefore going by Section 29 of Limitation of Actions Act, an application for extension of time could only be entertained if the suit had been filed by 12th March 2008. However to date almost 4 years after the death of the deceased no suit has been filed. Nevertheless I do note that Section 29(4) of the Limitation of Actions Act is inconsistent with Section 4(2) of the Limitation Act which provides for causes of action founded on tort to be statute barred after 3 years. In this case, the deceased’s cause of action arose on 13th March 2007 when he was involved in the road accident and this is the same day the deceased died. Under Section 4(2) the claim being founded on tort, limitation would only set in 3 years later i.e. on 13th March 2010. This appears to have been the position taken by the applicants. I have checked Succession Cause No.38 of 2010 and have noted that the applicants applied for letters of administration ad litem on 1st February 2010. It would be unfair and unjust to bar the applicants from pursuing the deceased’s cause of action after only 12 months from the date the cause of action arose. In the circumstances I find that this is an appropriate case in respect which this court can exercise its inherent jurisdiction so as to meet ends of justice by extending time to the applicants to file the suit out of time. Accordingly I hereby extend time for the applicants to file their suit within 60 days from the date hereof.
Orders accordingly.
H. M. OKWENGU
JUDGE
Delivered, dated and signed at Embu this 26th day of January 2011
In the presence of:- Mr. Okwaro for Applicant. Njue CC.