[2020] KEELC 233 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants delayed in lodging the appeal by about one month, but held that the delay was not inordinate. The court was satisfied that the applicants had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay, namely the late supply of the typed judgment. Applying the principles governing extension...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 233 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jane Mwiraria; Applicant: Stella Kanyata Mbaya; Respondent: Teresa Naitore Mwanja
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E00 3 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Delay in Filing Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Mwiraria
Applicant
Stella Kanyata Mbaya
Applicant
Teresa Naitore Mwanja
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay of about one month in lodging the appeal is inordinate and inexcusable.
- 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants delayed in lodging the appeal by about one month, but held that the delay was not inordinate. The court was satisfied that the applicants had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay, namely the late supply of the typed judgment. Applying the principles governing extension of time, the court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicants and granted leave to file the appeal out of time, subject to the condition that the appeal be filed within 14 days from the date of the judgment. The court also ordered the applicants to bear the costs of the miscellaneous suit.
Court Disposition
Application allowed with conditions.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicants to file an appeal out of time against the judgment in Meru CMCC No. 104 of 2018.
- The appeal must be filed within 14 days from the date of delivery of this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT MERU
ELC MISC CASE NO.E00 3 OF 2020
JANE MWIRARIA........................1ST APPLICANT
STELLA KANYATA MBAYA......2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
TERESA NAITORE MWANJA.......RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. Before me is a notice of motion dated 21. 9.2020, brought pursuant to provisions of Section 1A, 1B, 3A and 79 G of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 50 Rule 6 and 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking leave to file an appeal out of time against the Judgement/Decree of the Senior Principal Magistrate Hon T. Mwangi delivered on 30. 7.2020 in Meru CMCC NO. 104 OF 2018.
2. The applicants contend that the judgment was delivered in their absence. When they learnt about it, they applied for a typed copy of the judgment but the same was not supplied in good time. The applicants aver that the delay of about 24 days is not inordinate.
3. The respondent has opposed the application vide a replying affidavit sworn on 9. 10. 2020. She contends that the applicants are indolent, shrewd and untruthful and that they are out to mislead the court. She states that the advocate for the applicants was present when the judgment was delivered.
4. I have considered all the issues raised herein. Section 79 (g) of the Civil Procedure Act provides as follows;
“every appeal from a subordinate court to the High Court shall be filed within a period of thirty days from the date of the decree or order appealed against, excluding from such period any time which the lower court may certify as having been requisite for the preparation and delivery of a copy of the decree or order:
5. In the case of Fahim Yasin Twaha vs Timamy Issa Abdalla & 2 Others [2015] eKLR, the court held thus;
“Extension of time is not a right of a party. It is an equitable remedy that is only available to a deserving party, at the discretion of the Court. A party who seeks extension of time has the burden of laying a basis, to the satisfaction of the Court; Whether the Court should exercise the discretion to extend time, is a consideration to be made on a case- to- case basis”.
6. I find that the applicants delayed in lodging the appeal with about 1 month. That delay is not inordinate. I am inclined to give them the benefits of doubts. I therefore allow the application on condition that the appeal is filed within 14 days from the date of delivery of this Judgment. The applicant is to bear the costs of this miscellaneous suit.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020
HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE
ORDER
The date of delivery of this Judgment was given via a notice dated 7. 12. 2020. In light of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to the COVID-19 pandemicand following the practice directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice dated 17th March, 2020 and published in the Kenya Gazette of 17th April 2020 as Gazette Notice no.3137, this Judgment has been delivered to the parties by electronic mail. They are deemed to have waived compliance with order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court.
HON. LUCY N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE