[2022] KEELC 1147 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1147 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay of execution and injunction was filed after an inordinate delay, as judgment was delivered on 22nd July 2021 and the application was filed on 14th October 2021. The court noted that although the applicants claimed delay in obtaining proceedings, the certificate of delay...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1147 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jane Njeri Kibuthia; Plaintiff: Gladys Njambi Kabi; Plaintiff: Elizabeth Thaba Karura; Plaintiff: Agnes Wairimu Karanja; Plaintiff: Rebecca Wanjiru Kariuki; Defendant: Penninah Wambui Kinuthia; Defendant: Milka Mwaura; Defendant: Miriam Wanja Mwaura; Defendant: Pauline Wangui Kariuki
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 594 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Injunction Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Injunctions, Appeal Process, Delay in Filing, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Injunctions Appeal Process Delay in Filing Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Njeri Kibuthia

Plaintiff

Gladys Njambi Kabi

Plaintiff

Elizabeth Thaba Karura

Plaintiff

Agnes Wairimu Karanja

Plaintiff

Rebecca Wanjiru Kariuki

Plaintiff

Penninah Wambui Kinuthia

Defendant

Milka Mwaura

Defendant

Miriam Wanja Mwaura

Defendant

Pauline Wangui Kariuki

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Injunction Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the defendants/applicants are entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants/applicants are entitled to an injunction restraining the plaintiffs from dealing with the suit property pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the application was filed without undue delay and in compliance with procedural requirements.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for stay of execution and injunction was filed after an inordinate delay, as judgment was delivered on 22nd July 2021 and the application was filed on 14th October 2021. The court noted that although the applicants claimed delay in obtaining proceedings, the certificate of delay indicated that proceedings were ready by 28th October 2021. Furthermore, no memorandum of appeal had been filed in the Court of Appeal as of the date of the ruling. The court held that the applicants ought to pursue stay orders in the Court of Appeal rather than before this court. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution and injunction is dismissed.
  • There shall be no order as to costs.