[2018] KEHC 3111 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 3111 (KLR)

The court found that the petition had not complied with mandatory procedural requirements, specifically the payment of security for costs and service of the petition. In the absence of compliance and with no parties present to prosecute or oppose the matter, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 3111 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Nyaboke Matoke; Respondent: Orange Democratic Movement; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (I.E.B.C); Respondent: Agnes Zani; Respondent: Anita Ketora; Respondent: Beth Syengo; Respondent: Emily Oduor Ongwen; Respondent: Judith Pareno
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 24 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petitions / Mention; Order on Withdrawal and Dismissal
Outcome
petition dismissed for non-compliance with procedural requirements
Legal Topics
Nomination of Senate Members, Party List Procedures, Security for Costs, Service of Petition
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Constitutional Law Nomination of Senate Members Party List Procedures Security for Costs Service of Petition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Nyaboke Matoke

Applicant

Orange Democratic Movement

Respondent

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (I.E.B.C)

Respondent

Agnes Zani

Respondent

Anita Ketora

Respondent

Beth Syengo

Respondent

Emily Oduor Ongwen

Respondent

Judith Pareno

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petitions / Mention; Order on Withdrawal and Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the petition was properly before the court given non-payment of security for costs and lack of service.
  2. 2 Whether the petition should be dismissed due to procedural non-compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petition had not complied with mandatory procedural requirements, specifically the payment of security for costs and service of the petition. In the absence of compliance and with no parties present to prosecute or oppose the matter, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the petition. The dismissal was based on the principle that election petitions must strictly adhere to statutory and regulatory requirements, and failure to do so is fatal to the proceedings.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed for non-compliance with procedural requirements

Orders

  • There is no payment of security for costs and the petition has not been served.
  • The Petition dated 8th September 2017 and filed on the same date is dismissed.