[2013] KEHC 6161 (KLR)
The court determined that the appropriate multiplicand was the deceased's net monthly salary of KShs 16,764.35, with a dependency ratio of one-half, reflecting that the Plaintiff was the sole dependant. A multiplier of 28 years was adopted, considering the deceased's age, employment in the private sector, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 6161 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jane Thanji Wachira (Suing on her own behalf and on behalf of the estate of Lenny Mario Wachira, Deceased); Defendant: Toyota East Africa Ltd; Defendant: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd; Defendant: Harun Kimaru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 238 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff against the Defendants for damages as assessed, less 30% contributory negligence.
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accidents Act, Law Reform Act, Negligence, Damages Assessment, Contributory Negligence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Thanji Wachira (Suing on her own behalf and on behalf of the estate of Lenny Mario Wachira, Deceased)
Plaintiff
Toyota East Africa Ltd
Defendant
Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd
Defendant
Harun Kimaru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages under the Fatal Accidents Act for the death of the deceased.
- 2 What dependency ratio and multiplier should be applied in assessing damages for loss of dependency.
- 3 How should agreed damages and contributory negligence be factored into the final award.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the appropriate multiplicand was the deceased's net monthly salary of KShs 16,764.35, with a dependency ratio of one-half, reflecting that the Plaintiff was the sole dependant. A multiplier of 28 years was adopted, considering the deceased's age, employment in the private sector, and the uncertainties of life. The court applied the agreed 30% contributory negligence to all heads of damages. The final awards were calculated accordingly: pain and suffering (KShs 14,000), loss of expectation of life (KShs 70,000), damages under the Fatal Accidents Act (KShs 1,971,487.60), and special damages (KShs 1,190), all less 30%. Interest was awarded on general damages from...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff against the Defendants for damages as assessed, less 30% contributory negligence.
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded KShs 14,000 for pain and suffering, less 30%.
- Plaintiff awarded KShs 70,000 for loss of expectation of life, less 30%.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
46 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 238 OF 2010
JANE THANJI WACHIRA
(Suing on her own behalf and
on behalf of the estate of
LENNY MARIO WACHIRA, Deceased)…………………...….…...….... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
TOYOTA EAST AFRICA LTD
KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD
HARUN KIMARU……………………………………............ DEFENDANTS
J U D G M E N T
1. The Plaintiff’s claim in this suit is for damages in negligence on account of the death of one LENNY MARIO WACHIRA (herein-after called the Deceased). The Deceased died on 16th May 2009 following a road accident along the Sagana-Kenol road involving motor vehicles registration numbers KAX 727C, Toyota saloon and KAY 638G, Toyota matatu. The Deceased was a passenger in the first motor vehicle.
2. The Plaintiff was the mother of the Deceased. She brought this suit on her own behalf as a dependant of the Deceased and on behalf of his estate. Damages are claimed under the Law Reform Act, Cap 26 and the Fatal Accidents Act, Cap 32. It is pleaded that the 1st Defendant was the registered owner of motor vehicle registration KAX 727C and that the 2nd Defendant was the insured and equitable owner in possession of the said motor vehicle. It is further pleaded that the 3rd Defendant was the registered owner of motor vehicle KAY 638G.
3. On 26th January 2012 a consent judgment on liability and certain damages was entered as follows –
“ORDER: BY CONSENT-
Judgment be and is hereby entered for the Plaintiff against the Defendants on liability at the ratio of 70%/30%.
Damages under the Law Reform Act are agreed as follows –
(a) Pain and suffering …………. KShs 20,000/00
(b) Loss of expectation of life ……… 100,000/00
Special damages are agreed at KShs 1, 700/00.
The above figures are subject to the agreed contributory negligence.
Court to determine damages under the Fatal Accidents Act.
Hearing on the outstanding issue on 19/3/2012.
Costs in the cause.”
4. In this judgment therefore the court will determine only damages under the Fatal Accidents Act.
5. Only the Plaintiff testified. The Defendants did not lead or call evidence. I have considered the Plaintiff’s testimony. I have also considered the written submissions filed on behalf of the parties. The Plaintiff’s submissions were filed on 23rd March 2012 while those of the Defendants were filed on 26th March 2012.
6. At the time of his death the Deceased was aged 24 years. He was working with Kenya Commercial Bank, Naro Moru. He had been employed there immediately after University. His net pay after taxation was KShs 16,764/35 per month. He was a graduate of the University of Nairobi with a Bachelor of Commerce degree. He was not married and he lived alone. He did not have any children he might have been supporting. His sole dependant was his mother who he was financially supporting, particularly in repaying loans that she had taken to educate him.
7. What came out in cross-examination was that the Deceased appeared to live quite frugally. He lived in a single rented room in Naro Moro town paying a rent of only KShs 2,500/00 per month plus KShs 500/00 for water and electricity. Apparently he had worked for only two months when he met his untimely death. In those two months he paid KShs 17,000/00 towards his mother’s loans.
8. I will in these circumstances award a multiplicand of KShs 16,764/35 and a dependency ratio of one-half.
9. As for the multiplier, I will take into account that the Public Service mandatory retirement age of 60 years did not necessarily apply in the private sector where the Deceased worked. But I have to take into account the vagaries and vicissitudes of life. Doing the best that I can, after looking at the cases cited, I will award a multiplier of 28 years.
10. Damages under the Fatal Accidents Act thus work out at KShs 2, 816, 410/80made up as follows -
KShs 16,764/35 X 12 X 28 X 1/2 = KShs 2,816,410/80.
11. In summary, there will be judgment for the Plaintiff as follows (all figures being less 30% contributory negligence) –
(i) Pain and suffering …………..…….KShs 14,000/00
(ii) Loss of Expectation of life …….…..…..70,000/00
(iii) Under the Fatal Accidents Act..……1,971,487/60
(iv) Special damages ……………………………1,190/00
12. The general damages will carry interest at court rates from the date of judgment and the special damages from the date of suit.
13. The Plaintiff will have costs of the suit less 30% contributory negligence.
14. Those will be the orders of the court.
DATED, SIGNED AND PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT THIS
14TH DAY OF JUNE 2013
H. P. G. WAWERU
JUDGE