[2010] KEHC 223 (KLR)
The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal acted without jurisdiction when it purported to determine ownership and order the transfer of registered land, as such powers are not conferred upon it by Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The Tribunal's award and the resultant decree were therefore null...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 223 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jane Wangu Kinyua; Respondent: Land Disputes Tribunal Central Division; Respondent: P.M. Kerugoya; Respondent: Lucy Muthoni Kinyua
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review 31 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Tribunal award and subordinate court decree quashed.
- Judges
- J Karanja
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Registered Land, Certiorari, Quashing Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Wangu Kinyua
Applicant
Land Disputes Tribunal Central Division
Respondent
P.M. Kerugoya
Respondent
Lucy Muthoni Kinyua
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine ownership of registered land.
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's award and resultant decree were null and void for want of jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal acted without jurisdiction when it purported to determine ownership and order the transfer of registered land, as such powers are not conferred upon it by Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The Tribunal's award and the resultant decree were therefore null and void ab initio. The High Court allowed the application for certiorari, quashed the Tribunal's award and the subordinate court's decree, and confirmed that only the High Court or Resident Magistrate's Court (within pecuniary jurisdiction) can make such orders regarding registered land.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Tribunal award and subordinate court decree quashed.
Orders
- The award of the Land Disputes Tribunal Central Division dated 29th April 2009 and the resultant decree of the subordinate court are removed into the High Court and quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
JUDICIAL REVIEW NO. 31 OF 2009
JANE WANGU KINYUA..…………………...……..APPLICANT
VERSUS
1. LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL CENTRAL DIVISION
2. P.M. KERUGOYA
3. LUCY MUTHONI KINYUA ………………..RESPONDENTS
J U D G E M E N T
The Applicant herein is seeking an order of certiorari to remove into this court for purposes of quashing the order made by the Land Disputes Tribunal Central Division on 29th April 2009 and adopted by the court as judgment on 14. 05. 09 to the effect that the land Registrar Kirinyaga do register Land parcelNo. INOI/KIRIKO/1604 under LUCY MUTHONI KINYUA and JANE WANGU KINYUA both with equal shares; the executive officer do sign all document to facilitate transfer and the old title deed be dispensed with.
Leave to file the application was granted by this court on 15. 02. 2010. The award and the decree arising therefrom are annexed to the application. The main ground on which the Application is premised is that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in interfering with the ownership of registered land. It has been submitted that the Tribunal does not have such power.
I have considered the Application along with the rival affidavits and the written submissions filed by counsel herein.
There is no dispute that the land that was subject to the Tribunal proceedings is registered to the ex-parte Applicant under the provisions of Cap 300 of the Laws of Kenya.
That in itself divests jurisdiction from the Land Tribunal to arbitrate over. The Tribunal’s mandate is clearly expressed under Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal act. The same does not include determination of ownership of registered land. The Tribunal did not therefore have jurisdiction to entertain the interested parties claim.
The Tribunal does not have power either to order that a Title Deed be canceled or rectified. Such orders are the preserve of this court or the Resident Magistrate’s courts in instances where their pecuniary jurisdiction so allows.
For these reasons, the impugned award was made without jurisdiction. The same has no force of law and is null and void ab initio.The notice of motion dated 1. 03. 2010 is therefore allowed. The award in question together with the resultant decree of the subordinate court are removed into this court and the same are hereby quashed.
W. KARANJA
JUDGE
Delivered, dated & signed at Embu this 22nd day of November 2010
In presence of:- Mr. Magee for Ms. Fatuma for ex-parte applicant.