[2013] KEHC 2513 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2513 (KLR)

The court found that the sentence of five years imprisonment imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing under Section 275 of the Penal Code was illegal, as the maximum sentence provided by law is three years. Exercising its revisionary jurisdiction under Sections 362 and 363(2) of the Criminal Procedure...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 2513 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Janet Ayemba; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 174 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
sentence revised; applicant to be released immediately
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Sentencing Illegality, Revisionary Jurisdiction, Stealing Offences
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Illegality Revisionary Jurisdiction Stealing Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Janet Ayemba

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant exceeded the statutory maximum for the offence of stealing under Section 275 of the Penal Code.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its revisionary jurisdiction to correct an illegal sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sentence of five years imprisonment imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing under Section 275 of the Penal Code was illegal, as the maximum sentence provided by law is three years. Exercising its revisionary jurisdiction under Sections 362 and 363(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court set aside the illegal sentence and substituted it with a sentence of twelve months, taking into account that the applicant was a first offender, pleaded guilty, and was remorseful. As the applicant had already served the substituted sentence in full, the court ordered her immediate release.

Court Disposition

sentence revised; applicant to be released immediately

Orders

  • The sentence of five years imprisonment is set aside and substituted with a sentence of twelve months from 12th June 2012.
  • The applicant having served the substituted sentence in full, is to be released from prison immediately.