[2013] KEHC 5193 (KLR)
The court found that the petition was an improper attack on the educational qualifications of the interested parties, as the law vests the responsibility for determining such qualifications in the returning officer and the IEBC. Any objections regarding qualifications constitute nomination disputes, which the IEBC...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5193 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Janet Ndago Ekumbo Mbete; Respondent: Hon Attorney General; Respondent: The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Kenya National Examinations Council; Respondent: University of Nairobi; Respondent: Hon Hassan Ali Joho; Respondent: Hazel Katana
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 39 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- DAS Majanja, CC Kipkorir, GV Odunga
- Legal Topics
- Election Qualifications, Right to Information, Nomination Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Janet Ndago Ekumbo Mbete
Applicant
Hon Attorney General
Respondent
The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Kenya National Examinations Council
Respondent
University of Nairobi
Respondent
Hon Hassan Ali Joho
Respondent
Hazel Katana
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Hon Hassan Ali Joho and Hazel Katana met the academic qualifications to vie for Governor and Deputy Governor of Mombasa County.
- 2 Whether the nomination of the interested parties was null and void for lack of valid university degrees.
- 3 Whether the petitioner's right under Article 38 of the Constitution was violated by the nomination of unqualified candidates.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petition was an improper attack on the educational qualifications of the interested parties, as the law vests the responsibility for determining such qualifications in the returning officer and the IEBC. Any objections regarding qualifications constitute nomination disputes, which the IEBC is empowered to resolve under Article 88(4)(e) of the Constitution. The court further held that the issue of qualification can be raised even after elections. Since the petition lacked merit, the court also rejected the Chamber Summons seeking access to academic records, as it was anchored on the unmeritorious petition. Accordingly, the petition and all related applications were...
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition is dismissed.
- The Chamber Summons dated 29th January 2013 is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
39 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Petition 39 of 2013 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-ZA X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; text-align:justify; text-indent:-17. 85pt; line-height:200%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]
JANET NDAGO EKUMBO MBETE .............................................................................PETITIONER
AND
HON ATTORNEY GENERAL .............................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORALAND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION .....2ND RESPONDENT
KENYA NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL.............................................3RD RESPONDENT
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI .................................................................................4TH RESPONDENT
AND
HON HASSAN ALI JOHO .........................................................................1ST INTERESTED PARTY
HAZEL KATANA .......................................................................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY
JUDGMENT
1. After hearing the petition on 31st January 2013, we dismissed it with no order as to costs.
2. By a petition dated 29th January 2013,
(a)That a declaration be issued to declare that the Hon Hassan Ali Joho and Hazel Katana do not meet the basic academic qualification of holding a degree from a university recognised in Kenya to vie for the positions of Governor and Deputy Governor Seats of Mombasa County.
(b)That a declaration be issued to declare that the nomination of Hon Hassan Ali Joho and/or Hazel Katana to vie for the positions of Governor and Deputy Governor respectively for Mombasa County is null and void ab initio on account of the two candidates lacking valid qualification of a degree from a university recognised in Kenya.
(c)That a declaration be issued to declare that the nomination of Hon Hassan Ali Joho and Hazel Katana to contest for the positions of Governor and Deputy Governor seats of Mombasa County will violet the petitioner’s rights under Article 38 of the Constitution to be respected by academically qualified persons.
(d)That the costs of this petition be borne by the respondents.
3. In addition to the petition, the petitioner filed a Chamber Summons dated 29th January 2013 which sought the following reliefs;
(3) That the Honourable Court be pleased to order the 3rd and 4th respondents whether jointly and or severally to furnish the applicant with certified true copies of the following information and/or documents.
(i)Certified copies of the examination result slips in relation to Hassan Ali Joho and Hazel Katana for the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE).
(ii)Certified copies of transcripts for Hassan Ali Joho for any degree course he may have enrolled for at the University of Nairobi.
(iii)Certified confirmation of the graduation of Hassan Ali Joho for any degree course he may have enrolled for at the University of Nairobi.
(iv)Certified confirmation of the degree constitution held by Hazel Katana.
(4) That the Court be pleased to give any directions and further orders necessary to secure the applicant’s right to access to information secured by Article 35 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
4. We heard the parties and in our view, the petition lacks merit for several reasons. First, the petition is an attack on the educational qualifications of the interested parties. As parties are required by law to qualify for consideration to be nominated, the returning officer receiving the papers will be required to address himself or herself on the issues raised by the petitioners. Secondly, if any objection is lodged with IEBC, it constitutes a nomination dispute which IEBC is empowered to resolve under Article 88(4)(e) of the Constitution. Thirdly, the issue of qualification can always be raised even after elections as it does with the qualification of candidates.
5. In the circumstances, we found no merit in the petition and consequently rejected the Chamber Summons dated 29th January 2013 as it is anchored on the petition.
DatedandDelivered at Nairobithis 5th February 2013
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
W. KORIR
JUDGE
G. V. ODUNGA
JUDGE