[2024] KEELC 5622 (KLR)
The court found that the parties had agreed to the issuance of status quo orders to preserve the suit property. The court exercised its discretion to grant the orders as prayed, holding that maintaining the current state of the property was necessary to prevent alienation or interference that could jeopardize the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 5622 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jannah Properties Limited; Respondent: National Environment Management Authority; Respondent: Water Resource Authority; Respondent: Nairobi City County; Respondent: Ministry of Interior & Coordination of National Government; Respondent: The Inspector General of the National Police Service; Respondent: The Hon Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Land Case Petition E039 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Status Quo Orders
- Outcome
- Status quo orders granted as prayed; suit property to be preserved pending hearing and determination of the petition.
- Judges
- JA Mogeni
- Legal Topics
- Status Quo Orders, Alienation of Land, Environmental Regulation, Title Protection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jannah Properties Limited
Applicant
National Environment Management Authority
Respondent
Water Resource Authority
Respondent
Nairobi City County
Respondent
Ministry of Interior & Coordination of National Government
Respondent
The Inspector General of the National Police Service
Respondent
The Hon Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Case Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Status Quo Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether status quo orders should be issued to preserve the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the petition.
- 2 Whether alienation or interference with the suit property should be restrained until the petition is resolved.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the parties had agreed to the issuance of status quo orders to preserve the suit property. The court exercised its discretion to grant the orders as prayed, holding that maintaining the current state of the property was necessary to prevent alienation or interference that could jeopardize the title or subject matter of the petition. The orders ensure that no party will gain an unfair advantage or cause prejudice before the substantive issues in the petition are heard and determined. The court emphasized that such orders are appropriate where the preservation of property is essential to the fair and just resolution of the dispute.
Court Disposition
Status quo orders granted as prayed; suit property to be preserved pending hearing and determination of the petition.
Orders
- Status quo orders issued: the suit property shall not be alienated, sold, transferred, constructed upon, demolished, or otherwise interfered with until the petition is heard and determined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Jannah Properties Limited v National Environment Management Authority & 5 others (Land Case Petition E039 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 5622 (KLR) (9 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 5622 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Land Case Petition E039 of 2024
JA Mogeni, J
July 9, 2024
Between
Jannah Properties Limited
Petitioner
and
National Environment Management Authority
1st Respondent
Water Resource Authority
2nd Respondent
Nairobi City County
3rd Respondent
Ministry of Interior & Coordination of National Government
4th Respondent
The Inspector General of the National Police Service
5th Respondent
The Hon Attorney General
6th Respondent
Ruling
1. The Court notes that the parties have moved to have the application comprised and sought to have the court grant which I do hereby issue as prayed.
2. Status Quo orders hereby issued herewith mean that the suit property should not be alienated in any way whether through, sale, transfer, construction, demolition or in any other way as to jeopardize the title till the instant Petition is heard and determined.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 2024……………...MOGENI J.JUDGEIn the Presence of:Mr. Mumia for Petitioner/ApplicantMs. Karimi holding brief for Ms. Mogire for 3rd RespondentMr. Ngara for 1st RespondentMr. Olewe holding brief for 2nd RespondentMs. Kubai for 4th, 5th, and 6th RespondentMs. Caroline Sagina: Court Assistant……………...MOGENI J.JUDGE