[2012] KEHC 1951 (KLR)
The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Appeals Tribunal acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to cancel registered land titles and order reversion to previous ownership. The Land Disputes Tribunals Act (Cap 303A) did not empower the tribunals to determine disputes...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 1951 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jannes Juma Oloo & Others; Respondent: Siaya District Land Disputes Tribunal & Others
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review 17 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed with costs to the applicants.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Registered Land Titles, Certiorari, Ultra Vires Actions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jannes Juma Oloo & Others
Applicant
Siaya District Land Disputes Tribunal & Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Siaya Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine disputes involving registered land titles.
- 2 Whether the orders issued by the tribunals to cancel registered titles and revert land to previous ownership were valid.
- 3 Whether the interested party had locus standi to claim the suit property without letters of administration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Appeals Tribunal acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to cancel registered land titles and order reversion to previous ownership. The Land Disputes Tribunals Act (Cap 303A) did not empower the tribunals to determine disputes involving registered land or to issue orders affecting title. Consequently, the decisions and orders of the tribunals were ultra vires and of no legal effect. The court allowed the application for certiorari, quashing the impugned decisions and awarding costs to the applicants.
Court Disposition
Application allowed with costs to the applicants.
Orders
- The decision of the Siaya Land Disputes Tribunal dated 23-9-2009 is quashed.
- The decision of the Nyanza Provincial Land Dispute Tribunal Appeals Committee adopted as judgment by Kisumu SPM Misc. Appl. No. 26/2009 on 2-11-2010 is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
Judicial Review 17 of 2011
JANNES JUMA OLOO & OTHERS..................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
SIAYA DISTRICT LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL & OTHERS......RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The applicant\'s notice of motion dated 3-5-2011 prays that:-
(1)The honourable court be pleased to grant the orders in the nature of certiorari, removing into this court for the purpose of being quashed the decision of the Siaya Land Disputes Tribunal dated 23-9-2009 which was upheld by the Nyanza Provincial land Dispute Tribunal Appeals Committee in its decision adopted as judgment by Kisumu SPM Misc. Appl. No. 26/2009 on 2-11-2010.
The application is supported by the affidavit of Jannes Oloo as well as the statement of facts. The substance of his application is that the deponent together with the 2nd and 3rd applicant are the registered proprietors of land parcel No. Ugenya/Unyundo/673 while the 4th applicant is the registered proprietor of land parcel No. Ugenya/Uyondo/674.
When this matter came before the Land Dispute Tribunal at Siaya the interested party was awarded the parcels of land. The applicant\'s were dissatisfied and they proceeded to the Provincial Appeals Tribunal where the said tribunal in dismissing the applicant\'s appeal stated that:-
“Appeal dismissed. The verdict of the Siaya Land Dispute Tribunal is upheld. The Siaya Land District Registrar is hereby ordered to reposes the two title deeds i.e. Ugenya/Uyundo/673 and 674 and revert it to old title No. ugenya/Uyundo/493 and issue a new title deed to be issued to Brian Nungo Akwir measuring 50 ft by 274 ft. The remaining portion is to be given to the appellants”.
The interested party has supported the tribunal decision. According to him he has stayed in the suit property for over 36 years and thus he has a claim over the said land.
His replying affidavit sworn on 20-10-2011 further avers that the applicant\'s allegations that he has no locus standi as he has not obtained letters of administration in respect to the estate of his father the late Clement Nungo Akwir is untenable since he has been the one using and residing on the land.
Having perused all the pleadings by the parties, the law governing Land Disputes Tribunal is the now repealed chapter 303 A of the Laws of Kenya. The same clearly provides the mandate of the Tribunals. Section 3 (1) thereof provides its jurisdiction thus:-
“Subject to this Act all cases of a civil nature involving a dispute as to:
(a)The division of or the determination of boundaries to land including land held in common.
(b)A claim to occupy or work land or
(c)Trespass to land.
Shall be heard and determined by a tribunal established under section 4”.
Although the interested party could be having a legitimate claim over the suit properties, the proper forum was not through the tribunal which did not have the mandate to adjudicate over a registered parcel of land. The orders issued by the tribunal demanding the cancellation of the titles were orders in vain. Both the tribunal at Siaya and the appellant tribunal acted ultra vires.
The upshot of this is that the application dated 3-5-2011 is allowed with costs to the appellant\'s.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kisumu this 15th day of October 2012
H.K. CHEMITEI JUDGE
In the presence of:
Otieno for Opondo for the applicant
Ayone for Kadera for the respondents