[2016] KEHC 3006 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3006 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st Defendant admitted to cultivating the suit property, which established a prima facie case for his joinder as a defendant in a trespass action. The court further held that there was no evidence to show that the land in dispute before the Bahari Land Disputes Tribunal in case No.108 of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 3006 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Japhet Katana Pande; Defendant: Benson Nyinge; Defendant: Paul Majimbo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 178 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defendants and Suit
Outcome
Defendants' application dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Joinder of Parties, Res Judicata, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trespass to Land Joinder of Parties Res Judicata Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Japhet Katana Pande

Plaintiff

Benson Nyinge

Defendant

Paul Majimbo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defendants and Suit

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants have been improperly joined in the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the suit is res judicata due to prior proceedings before the Bahari Land Disputes Tribunal.
  3. 3 Whether the Defendants' actions amount to trespass on the Plaintiff's land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st Defendant admitted to cultivating the suit property, which established a prima facie case for his joinder as a defendant in a trespass action. The court further held that there was no evidence to show that the land in dispute before the Bahari Land Disputes Tribunal in case No.108 of 2005 was the same as the suit property in the present case. As such, the doctrine of res judicata did not apply. The application to strike out the Defendants and the suit was therefore dismissed, as the issues raised required determination at trial.

Court Disposition

Defendants' application dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff.

Orders

  • The Defendants' application dated 30th October, 2015 is dismissed with costs.