[2021] KEBPRT 359 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 359 (KLR)

The Tribunal determined that it lacks jurisdiction to punish for contempt of court, as its powers are limited by section 12(2) of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, which expressly excludes criminal matters. Contempt of court, being a quasi-criminal offence, falls outside the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 359 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Japheth Kipkemboi Serem T/A Muskut Groceries; Respondent: AIC Christian Book Centre Limited; Respondent: The Board of Trustees African Inland Church Kenya
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 20 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Contempt Application
Outcome
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondents.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Landlord Tenant Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Contempt of Court Jurisdiction of Tribunals Landlord Tenant Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Japheth Kipkemboi Serem T/A Muskut Groceries

Applicant

AIC Christian Book Centre Limited

Respondent

The Board of Trustees African Inland Church Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the Business Premises Rent Tribunal has jurisdiction to punish for contempt of court.
  2. 2 Whether the application for contempt can be entertained after the tenant has vacated the premises.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal determined that it lacks jurisdiction to punish for contempt of court, as its powers are limited by section 12(2) of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, which expressly excludes criminal matters. Contempt of court, being a quasi-criminal offence, falls outside the Tribunal's mandate. The Judicature Act vests the power to punish for contempt in the High Court and Court of Appeal, not in subordinate courts or tribunals. Consequently, the Tribunal struck out the applicant's contempt application for want of jurisdiction and awarded costs to the respondents.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondents.

Orders

  • The application dated 3rd May 2021 is struck out.
  • The respondents are awarded costs assessed at Kshs.20,000/- against the applicant.