[2021] KEBPRT 359 (KLR)
The Tribunal determined that it lacks jurisdiction to punish for contempt of court, as its powers are limited by section 12(2) of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, which expressly excludes criminal matters. Contempt of court, being a quasi-criminal offence, falls outside the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEBPRT 359 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Japheth Kipkemboi Serem T/A Muskut Groceries; Respondent: AIC Christian Book Centre Limited; Respondent: The Board of Trustees African Inland Church Kenya
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 20 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Contempt Application
- Outcome
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Landlord Tenant Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Japheth Kipkemboi Serem T/A Muskut Groceries
Applicant
AIC Christian Book Centre Limited
Respondent
The Board of Trustees African Inland Church Kenya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Contempt Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Business Premises Rent Tribunal has jurisdiction to punish for contempt of court.
- 2 Whether the application for contempt can be entertained after the tenant has vacated the premises.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined that it lacks jurisdiction to punish for contempt of court, as its powers are limited by section 12(2) of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, which expressly excludes criminal matters. Contempt of court, being a quasi-criminal offence, falls outside the Tribunal's mandate. The Judicature Act vests the power to punish for contempt in the High Court and Court of Appeal, not in subordinate courts or tribunals. Consequently, the Tribunal struck out the applicant's contempt application for want of jurisdiction and awarded costs to the respondents.
Court Disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondents.
Orders
- The application dated 3rd May 2021 is struck out.
- The respondents are awarded costs assessed at Kshs.20,000/- against the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
VIEW PARK TOWERS 7TH & 8TH FLOOR
TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 20 OF 2021 (ELDORET)
JAPHETH KIPKEMBOI SEREM
T/A MUSKUT GROCERIES............................................................TENANT
VERSUS
AIC CHRISTIAN BOOK CETRE LIMITED.........................1ST LANDLORD
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AFRICAN INLAND
CHURCH KENYA...................................................................2ND LANDLORD
RULING
1. Before me is an application dated 3rd May 2021 in which the applicant (Japheth Kipkemboi Serem) is seeking that the 1st and 2nd Respondents’ directors be cited for contempt of court and be committed to Civil jail for a term of six (6) months and/or be ordered to purge the contempt of court in terms that this Tribunal will deem fit.
2. The application is supported by the Applicant’s affidavit sworn on 3rd May 2021 and the grounds on the face thereof.
3. The application is opposed through a preliminary objection and a replying affidavit both dated 28th May 2021.
4. The preliminary objection is to the effect that the Tribunal has no powers to punish for contempt and that the Tenant having vacated the premises, the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter.
5. As was held in the Locus Classicus case of the owners of the motor vessel “Joey” –vs- owners of the motor Tugs “Barbara” & “Steve B” (2007) eKLR at page 7/15 jurisdiction is a threshold issue which ought to be dealt with as soon as it is raised by a party or on the court’s own motion.
6. Citing Nyarangi J (as then was), the court held as follows:-
“I think it is reasonably plain that a question of jurisdiction ought to be raised at the earliest opportunity and the court seized…..of the matter is then obliged to decide the issue right away on the material before it. Jurisdiction is everything. Without it, a court has no power to make one more step. Where a court has no jurisdiction, there would be no basis for a continuation of proceedings pending other evidence. A court of law down (sic) tools in respect of the matter before it the moment it holds the opinion that it is without jurisdiction”.
7. This Tribunal’s jurisdiction is conferred by the Landlord and Tenant (shops, hotels and catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301 Laws of Kenya at section 12 thereof.
8. Section 12 (2) of the said Act provides as follows:
“ A Tribunal shall not have or exercise any jurisdiction in any criminal matter or entertain any criminal proceedings for any offence whether under this Act or otherwise”.
9. It is trite law that contempt of court is a quasi criminal offence and the proceedings for its punishment are returnable before the superior court under Section 5 of the judicature Act which provides as follows:-
“(1) The High court and the court of Appeal shall have the same power to punish for contempt as is for the time being possessed by the High Court of Justice in England, and such power shall extend to upholding the Authority and dignity of subordinate courts”.
10. Under Article 169(1)(d) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, local tribunals are classified as subordinate courts and as such, section 5 of the Judicature Act applies in equal measure to them.
11. In the premises, I find and hold that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to punish for contempt and proceed to strike out the application dated 3rd May 2021 with costs.
12. The Respondents’ costs are hereby assessed at Kshs.20,000/- against the Applicant.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVER VIRTUALLY THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021.
HON. GAKUHI CHEGE
VICE CHAIR
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
In the presence of:
Chemoiyai for Tenant/Applicant
No appearance for the Landlord