[2006] KEHC 1133 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant was properly convicted on his own plea of guilty and that the trial court exercised its discretion properly in sentencing him to ten years imprisonment, which is below the statutory maximum of fourteen years. The appellant's mitigation, including his claim of having young children,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1133 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Japheth Resa Nyangwai; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 330 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unnatural Offences, Sentencing Principles, Appeal on Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Japheth Resa Nyangwai
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of ten years imprisonment for the offence of unnatural offence was harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether there was any basis for the appellate court to interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant was properly convicted on his own plea of guilty and that the trial court exercised its discretion properly in sentencing him to ten years imprisonment, which is below the statutory maximum of fourteen years. The appellant's mitigation, including his claim of having young children, was not persuasive, especially in light of his earlier mitigation that he had no wife. The appellate court found no basis to interfere with the sentence as it was neither harsh nor excessive given the circumstances and the law.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The sentence of ten years imprisonment imposed by the trial court is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 330 of 2004
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.2206 of 2004 of the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Nyahururu – KATHOKA NGOMO, P.M.)
JAPHETH RESA NYANGWAI…….………......................................................………APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC……………....................................................………………..…………RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The appellant was charged with committing an unnatural offence contrary to Section 162B of the Penal Code. The particular of the offence were that on 17th May 2004 at H.Village in Laikipia district within the Rift Valley Province he had carnal knowledge of an animal namely a cow. He pleaded guilty to the said charge and was convicted and sentenced to serve ten years imprisonment. He was a first offender. The appellant was aggrieved by the said sentence and preferred an appeal to this court saying that the sentence was harsh and excessive.
When the appeal came up for hearing he pleaded with the court to reduce the sentence saying that he had young children which he needed to go and take care of. Mr. Gumo, Assistant Deputy Public Prosecutor chose to leave the matter to the court’s consideration.
I have perused the short proceedings and noted that the appellant was properly convicted of the said offence. In his mitigation before the trial court he prayed for lenience saying that he had no wife. If that was his excuse for engaging in the unnatural offence which he was charged with, this court cannot have mercy on such a person who now says that he has young children which he wants to go and take care of. He may turn to be a molester of the said children, if indeed he has any. In any event the trial court exercised its discretion properly in handing down the sentence of ten years of imprisonment to the appellant, considering that the maximum sentence of such an offence is fourteen years. I see no basis of interfering with the sentence that was pronounced by the trial court and I dismiss this appeal.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at Nakuru this 5th day of October, 2006.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE
Judgment delivered in open court in the presence of the present and Mr. Gumo, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the state.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE