[2012] KEHC 3617 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 3617 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent, Japhew Wanyama Makira, failed to establish any relationship to the deceased and did not provide evidence of being a beneficiary entitled to L.R. NO. KABRAS/KILIBOTI/114. The court noted that there was no pending suit regarding the parcel and that previous litigation had been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 3617 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Japhew Wanyama Makira; Applicant: Patrick Were Wetiba; Respondent: Kerestina N. Wetiba & 6 Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Citation Cause 853 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Citation Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant and Protest
Outcome
Protest struck out; estate to be distributed as per applicant's proposal; each party to bear own costs.
Legal Topics
Succession, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Protest to Distribution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Succession Distribution of Estate Confirmation of Grant Protest to Distribution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Japhew Wanyama Makira

Respondent

Patrick Were Wetiba

Applicant

Kerestina N. Wetiba & 6 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Citation Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant and Protest

  1. 1 Whether the respondent, Japhew Wanyama Makira, is entitled to a share of L.R. NO. KABRAS/KILIBOTI/114 as a beneficiary of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 Whether the distribution of L.R. NO. KABRAS/KILIBOTI/114 should be held in abeyance pending resolution of other disputes.
  3. 3 Whether the proposed distribution of the estate by the applicant should be confirmed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent, Japhew Wanyama Makira, failed to establish any relationship to the deceased and did not provide evidence of being a beneficiary entitled to L.R. NO. KABRAS/KILIBOTI/114. The court noted that there was no pending suit regarding the parcel and that previous litigation had been concluded. The respondent's request to hold the distribution in abeyance was deemed unreasonable. Consequently, the protest was struck out and the estate was ordered to be distributed as proposed by the applicant in the summons for confirmation of grant dated 18th July, 2011.

Court Disposition

Protest struck out; estate to be distributed as per applicant's proposal; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The protest by Japhew Wanyama Makira is struck out.
  • The estate of the deceased shall be distributed in accordance with the affidavit in support of summons for confirmation of grant dated 18th July, 2011.