[2019] KEELRC 1560 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1560 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant failed to prove he worked for the respondent during the three years he claimed to be owed salary. The claimant did not explain who he was working for or who paid him tips during the Director's absence. The court held that non-payment of salary for such an extended period constitutes...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1560 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Jared Odawa Oluga; Respondent: Bethany Village Africa
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1125 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Employment Contracts, Unpaid Wages, Termination of Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Employment Contracts Unpaid Wages Termination of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jared Odawa Oluga

Claimant

Bethany Village Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was employed by the respondent during the period claimed.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid wages for three years.
  3. 3 Whether non-payment of salary constitutes a fundamental breach of contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant failed to prove he worked for the respondent during the three years he claimed to be owed salary. The claimant did not explain who he was working for or who paid him tips during the Director's absence. The court held that non-payment of salary for such an extended period constitutes a fundamental breach of contract, which would have terminated the employment relationship. Therefore, the claim for unpaid wages was not substantiated and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim is dismissed with no orders as to costs.