[2019] KEELRC 1860 (KLR)
The court found that the Respondent failed to discharge its statutory burden under sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007 to prove valid and fair reasons for the Claimant's summary dismissal. The Claimant's evidence that he was not afforded a hearing remained unrebutted, and the Respondent did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1860 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Jared Ondieki Gechuchu; Respondent: Boera Main Security Services Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 996 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; summary dismissal declared unfair; compensation and other monetary awards granted.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Compensation for Unfair Dismissal, Notice Pay, Leave Entitlement, Underpayment of Wages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jared Ondieki Gechuchu
Claimant
Boera Main Security Services Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summary dismissal of the Claimant was unfair under the Employment Act, 2007.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair dismissal.
- 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to pay in lieu of notice, untaken leave, underpayments, wages for March 2017, and severance pay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Respondent failed to discharge its statutory burden under sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007 to prove valid and fair reasons for the Claimant's summary dismissal. The Claimant's evidence that he was not afforded a hearing remained unrebutted, and the Respondent did not participate in the proceedings beyond entering appearance. Consequently, the summary dismissal was declared unfair. The court awarded the Claimant compensation equivalent to 8 months' gross wages, pay in lieu of notice, and wages for March 2017. Claims for untaken leave, underpayments, and severance pay were dismissed for lack of proof or statutory inapplicability.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; summary dismissal declared unfair; compensation and other monetary awards granted.
Orders
- The summary dismissal of the Claimant is declared unfair.
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 95,200 as compensation for unfair dismissal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
50 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 996 OF 2017
JARED ONDIEKI GECHUCHU...................................CLAIMANT
v
BOERA MAIN SECURITY SERVICES LTD........ RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. Although Boera Security Services Ltd (Respondent) entered Appearance through the firm of Moindi & Co. Advocates on 6 July 2017, it did not cause a Response to be filed.
2. The Cause therefore proceeded as undefended Cause on 19 February 2019. Jared Ondieki Gechuchu (Claimant) testified and thereafter filed his submissions on 15 March 2019.
3. The Court has considered the pleadings, evidence and submissions.
Unfair termination of employment
4. The Claimant was employed by the Respondent in 2009 as a security supervisor and served until 13 February 2017 when he was issued with a notice of termination of employment (summary dismissal).
5. In his testimony, the Claimant denied the validity of the reasons given in the dismissal letter (the reasons were promoting and acting in the interests of a competitor).
6. The Claimant also asserted that he was not afforded an opportunity to be heard.
7. Because this was a case of summary dismissal, the Respondent was under a mandatory obligation to hear the Claimant as demanded by section 41(2) of the Employment Act, 2007.
8. The Claimant’s evidence that he was not heard remained unrebutted.
9. Further, the Respondent was under a statutory burden in terms of sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007 to prove the reasons for the dismissal, and that the reasons were valid and fair.
10. That statutory burden was not discharged as the Respondent did not lead any evidence.
11. The Court therefore finds that the summary dismissal of the Claimant was unfair.
Compensation
12. The Claimant served the Respondent for about 8 years, and in consideration of the length of service, the Court will award the equivalent of 8 months gross wages as compensation (most recent pay slip produced was for September 2016 and indicates gross wage of Kshs 11,900/-).
Pay in lieu of notice
13. Since the Claimant was paid by the month, the Court will allow 1 month pay in lieu of notice of Kshs 10,500/-.
Breach of contract/statute
Leave
14. The Claimant sought Kshs 84,000/- being untaken leave for the 8 years of service.
15. The Claimant did not suggest that he applied for leave and was denied.
16. Further, section 28(4) of the Employment Act, 2008 circumscribes leave which can be carried forward to at most 18 months.
17. However, there was no evidence led that the Claimant sought and was denied permission to carry forward annual leave.
18. The Court will not therefore allow this head of claim.
Underpayments
19. Apart from producing pay slips for August 2009, October 2009, June 2012, February 2013, March 2014, April 2015 and September 2016, the Claimant did not lead evidence as to salary progression to enable the Court determine the details of underpayments in the course of employment.
20. The head of claim was not proved.
Wages for March 2017
21. Under this head, the Claimant sought Kshs 4,846/-. He is entitled to the same as of right.
Severance pay
22. This was not a case of redundancy and severance pay is not applicable as a remedy/due.
Conclusion and Orders
23. The Court finds and declares that the summary dismissal of the Claimant was unfair and awards him
(a) Compensation Kshs 95,200/-
(b) Pay in lieu of notice Kshs 10,500/-
TOTAL Kshs 105,700/-
24. Claimant to have costs on half scale.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 29th day of March 2019.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Ms. Mulomi instructed by Nyangito & Associates, Advocates
For Respondent Moindi & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Lindsey