[2019] KEHC 937 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 937 (KLR)

The court found that, in light of recent legal developments regarding the unconstitutionality of mandatory death sentences, the petitioner's sentence for robbery with violence should be reviewed. The court considered the seriousness of the offence, the fact that the victim suffered severe harm and prolonged...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 937 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jared Otieno Odindo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Petition 42 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Resentencing After Conviction and Dismissal of Appeals
Outcome
Death sentence set aside; substituted with thirty-five years' imprisonment from 19th February 2010.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Death Penalty Review
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Robbery With Violence Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Death Penalty Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jared Otieno Odindo

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Petition / Resentencing After Conviction and Dismissal of Appeals

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence should be reviewed in light of recent legal developments.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the petitioner given the circumstances of the offence and the probation report.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, in light of recent legal developments regarding the unconstitutionality of mandatory death sentences, the petitioner's sentence for robbery with violence should be reviewed. The court considered the seriousness of the offence, the fact that the victim suffered severe harm and prolonged hospitalization, and the petitioner's negative probation report, which highlighted his criminal history and lack of community support. Balancing these factors, the court substituted the death sentence with a term of thirty-five years' imprisonment, to be calculated from the original sentencing date.

Court Disposition

Death sentence set aside; substituted with thirty-five years' imprisonment from 19th February 2010.

Orders

  • The death sentence imposed in Butere SRMCCRC No. 480 of 2008 is set aside.
  • The petitioner is sentenced to thirty-five (35) years imprisonment, to run from 19th February 2010.