[2014] KEHC 4732 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 4732 (KLR)

The court found that since the appellant did not oppose the respondent's application for security for the decretal sum, and in line with the principles governing stay of execution pending appeal, it was appropriate to order the appellant to provide Kshs. 3,026,000 as security. The amount is to be deposited in a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 4732 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jarine Investment Limited; Respondent: Mitchell Cotts Freight (K) Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 48 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for security for stay of execution allowed; conditional stay granted.
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Judgment, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Judgment Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jarine Investment Limited

Appellant

Mitchell Cotts Freight (K) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should provide security for the decretal sum as a condition for stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the stay of execution should be lifted if the appellant fails to comply with the court's conditions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the appellant did not oppose the respondent's application for security for the decretal sum, and in line with the principles governing stay of execution pending appeal, it was appropriate to order the appellant to provide Kshs. 3,026,000 as security. The amount is to be deposited in a joint account of both advocates within fourteen days. Failure to comply would result in the automatic lifting of the stay of execution. The respondent was also awarded the costs of the application. The court's decision was guided by the need to balance the interests of both parties and to ensure that the appeal process is not rendered nugatory while also safeguarding the...

Court Disposition

Application for security for stay of execution allowed; conditional stay granted.

Orders

  • The appellant shall provide Kshs. 3,026,000 to be banked in a joint account of both advocates until further orders of the court.
  • If the appellant does not provide the said amount within fourteen days, the stay of execution of the judgment in CMCC Mombasa No. 1170 of 2013 shall automatically be lifted and set aside.