[2014] KEHC 2510 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 2510 (KLR)

The court adopted the parties' consent that those in occupation of the disputed land parcel No. KIANJAI/MITIUNTU/77 may continue their occupation but are restrained from carrying out any permanent development on the land pending the hearing and determination of the suit. This preserves the status quo and prevents...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 2510 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jason Kiamba Kimbui; Defendant: Francis Kamilichui; Defendant: Festus Kinyua; Defendant: James Kailemia & 4 Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 47 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
Application settled by consent; interlocutory orders granted as per parties' agreement.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Land Occupation, Permanent Development, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Land Occupation Permanent Development Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jason Kiamba Kimbui

Plaintiff

Francis Kamilichui

Defendant

Festus Kinyua

Defendant

James Kailemia & 4 Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to interlocutory injunctive relief restraining the respondents from developing parcel No. KIANJAI/MITIUNTU/77 pending hearing of the application and suit.
  2. 2 Whether parties in occupation should be allowed to continue occupation pending determination of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the parties' consent that those in occupation of the disputed land parcel No. KIANJAI/MITIUNTU/77 may continue their occupation but are restrained from carrying out any permanent development on the land pending the hearing and determination of the suit. This preserves the status quo and prevents irreversible changes to the property, balancing the interests of both parties until the substantive issues are resolved at trial. The consent was recorded as an order of the court, and costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application settled by consent; interlocutory orders granted as per parties' agreement.

Orders

  • Parties in occupation to continue with their occupation of parcel No. KIANJAI/MITIUNTU/77.
  • No party shall carry out any permanent development on the land pending hearing and determination of the suit.