[2019] KEHC 646 (KLR)
The court found that the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code was unconstitutional, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic [2017] eKLR. The court considered the petitioner's progress report, mitigation, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 646 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Jason Mlamba Seveni; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 109 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Death sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to eighteen years imprisonment from date of arrest.
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Sentencing, Death Penalty, Resentencing, Fundamental Rights, Robbery With Violence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Mlamba Seveni
Appellant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic [2017] eKLR.
- 3 What is the appropriate sentence for the petitioner given the circumstances and period already served.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code was unconstitutional, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic [2017] eKLR. The court considered the petitioner's progress report, mitigation, and the period already served in custody. It determined that the petitioner had demonstrated significant reform and positive conduct while incarcerated. Consequently, the court set aside the death sentence and substituted it with a determinate custodial sentence of eighteen years from the date of arrest, balancing the seriousness of the offence with the petitioner's rehabilitation and...
Court Disposition
Death sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to eighteen years imprisonment from date of arrest.
Orders
- The death sentence imposed upon the petitioner is set aside.
- The petitioner is sentenced to eighteen (18) years imprisonment from the date of arrest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
PETITION NO. 109 OF 2018
JASON MLAMBA SEVENI............................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS.....................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner herein was charged and convicted with Robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code in Voi Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 1286 of 2005 and sentenced to death. The Petitioner subsequently lodged a first appeal before the High Court and a second appeal in the Court of Appeal which were both dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 15th December, 2005 the Petitioner together with others robbed PIUS NGANDA a Radio Cassette make Sonny, Video Deck make LG, mobile phone make Nokia, one brown trouser and cash Shs, 5,500. They were armed with bow, arrows, pangas and rungus.
3. The Petitioner now claims that the sentencing to death by the trial court as well as the appellate court was an infringement of his fundamental rights. The Petitioner avers that the said courts interpreted the provisions of Section 296(2) of the Penal Code to mean that death sentence was the only sentence available to the Petitioner and that the said courts held the view that the death sentence under the said provisions was mandatory and no other sentence was tenable.
Hearing and Submissions
4. The matter came up for hearing on 7th October, 2019.
5. It was the Petitioner’s submissions that he is now reformed and a born again Christian, that he teaches and preaches the word of God as he is a pastor; that the 14 years he has served in custody is enough and wishes to be released and in the alternative be given a non custodial sentence of 20 years.
6. The Respondent (DPP) through its Counsel Mr. Fedha submitted that the Petitioner has served 14 years and prayed for a total of 30 as the sole intention by the Petitioner and the others was to kill.
The Determination
7. On the issue of sentence, the Supreme Court in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another -vs- Republic [2017] eKLRdeclared the mandatory nature of the death sentence as provided for under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code to be unconstitutional. To that extent this court only has to resentence the Petitioner.
8. I have perused the Petitioner’s Progress Report. I have also considered Petitioner’s mitigation. It is evident that the Petitioner has reformed going by the positive remarks issued by the Prison Officers. It is important to note that a result of the trial courts sentencing on 14th September, 2007 the Petitioner has already served 14 years in custody. In the circumstances, I do hereby set aside the death sentence imposed upon the Petitioner and in substitution the Petitioner is hereby jailed to the term of eighteen (18) years from the date of arrest.
Right of appeal in 14 days.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Mombasa this 18th day of December, 2019.
E. K. O. OGOLA
JUDGE
In the Presence of:
Ms. Mutua for DPP
Petitioner in person
Mr. Kaunda Court Assistant