[2017] KEELC 1245 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1245 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs failed to provide any written agreement of sale to demonstrate that they or their association purchased the suit land from the defendant, as required by Section 3(3) of the Law of Contract Act. The plaintiffs also admitted that their members do not reside on the land and that it...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1245 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jason Ombui Abuga; Plaintiff: Joseph Wambugu Muturi; Plaintiff: Patrick Mbugua Njoroge; Plaintiff: Benson Mbugua Mwangi; Plaintiff: Njuguna Gathu; Defendant: Mwanzo Development Company Ltd
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 265 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Land Ownership Disputes, Sale of Land, Title Documents
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Land Ownership Disputes Sale of Land Title Documents

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jason Ombui Abuga

Plaintiff

Joseph Wambugu Muturi

Plaintiff

Patrick Mbugua Njoroge

Plaintiff

Benson Mbugua Mwangi

Plaintiff

Njuguna Gathu

Plaintiff

Mwanzo Development Company Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case for grant of a mandatory injunction restraining the defendant from dealing with the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs have demonstrated irreparable loss that cannot be compensated by damages if the injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs have satisfied the legal requirements under Section 3(3) of the Law of Contract Act for recovery of land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs failed to provide any written agreement of sale to demonstrate that they or their association purchased the suit land from the defendant, as required by Section 3(3) of the Law of Contract Act. The plaintiffs also admitted that their members do not reside on the land and that it has been sold to third parties. In the absence of a sale agreement and evidence of irreparable loss, the plaintiffs did not establish a prima facie case with a probability of success or show that damages would not be an adequate remedy. Consequently, the application for a mandatory injunction was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 9th July, 2015 is dismissed with costs to the defendant.