[2021] KEELRC 477 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 477 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent, having been served and failing to oppose the application, left the Applicant's assertions uncontroverted. The Applicant demonstrated that the Respondent had disregarded a concluded recruitment process and prior court orders by re-advertising the position of Chief Executive...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 477 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Javas Bigambo; Respondent: The Board, Lake Victoria South Water Works Development Agency; Interested Party: Eng. George J.O Odedeh
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 5 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Outcome
Application allowed. Conservatory order granted.
Judges
CN Baari
Legal Topics
Public Service Recruitment, Fair Administrative Action, Conservatory Orders, Judicial Review, Appointment Procedures
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Administrative Law Public Service Recruitment Fair Administrative Action Conservatory Orders Judicial Review Appointment Procedures

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Javas Bigambo

Applicant

The Board, Lake Victoria South Water Works Development Agency

Respondent

Eng. George J.O Odedeh

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent's actions in re-advertising and nullifying the concluded recruitment process for Chief Executive Officer violated constitutional and statutory provisions.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant is entitled to conservatory orders restraining the Respondent from proceeding with a fresh recruitment pending determination of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent, having been served and failing to oppose the application, left the Applicant's assertions uncontroverted. The Applicant demonstrated that the Respondent had disregarded a concluded recruitment process and prior court orders by re-advertising the position of Chief Executive Officer, contrary to constitutional and statutory requirements. The court held that it was necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent further recruitment steps pending the determination of the petition to safeguard the integrity of public service recruitment and uphold the rule of law. Accordingly, the court granted the conservatory order as sought by the Applicant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Conservatory order granted.

Orders

  • A conservatory order is hereby issued prohibiting the Respondent, their employees, servants and/or agents or anyone acting on their behalf from shortlisting, interviewing, appointing or taking any further step towards filling the position of the Chief Executive Officer of Lake Victoria South Water Works Development...
  • Costs shall be in the cause.