[2000] KECA 410 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 410 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants brought their application for extension of time without delay, immediately after their previous appeals were struck out as incompetent. No grounds were presented by the respondents to oppose the exercise of the court's discretion in favour of the applicants. Consequently, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 410 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jayant Kumar Vrajlal Shah; Applicant: Mrs. Shiksha Devidas; Respondent: Midco Holdings (E.A) Limited; Respondent: Summit Textiles Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 289 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Extension of time granted for filing Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal. Costs awarded to respondents.
Judges
RO Kwach
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jayant Kumar Vrajlal Shah

Applicant

Mrs. Shiksha Devidas

Applicant

Midco Holdings (E.A) Limited

Respondent

Summit Textiles Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants brought their application for extension of time without delay, immediately after their previous appeals were struck out as incompetent. No grounds were presented by the respondents to oppose the exercise of the court's discretion in favour of the applicants. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time for filing the Notice of Appeal and the Record of Appeal, as the requirements under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules were satisfied.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Extension of time granted for filing Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal. Costs awarded to respondents.

Orders

  • Time for filing Notice of Appeal extended by 14 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Time for lodging Record of Appeal extended by 15 days from the date of filing the Notice of Appeal.