[2001] KECA 55 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 55 (KLR)

The application for stay of execution could not proceed as scheduled because one member of the bench, Shah JA, disqualified himself from hearing the matter. In the interests of justice and to ensure a fair hearing, the court ordered that the application be removed from the day's list and be set down for hearing...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 55 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jayantilal Gopal Patel; Respondent: West Kenya Sugar Company Ltd; Respondent: Credit Bank Ltd; Respondent: Panachand Jivraj Shah; Respondent: Hansraj Fulchand Gudka
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 339 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application stood over for hearing before a reconstituted bench; interim stay extended; costs in the application.
Judges
RO Kwach, AB Shah
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Judicial Recusal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeal Procedure Judicial Recusal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jayantilal Gopal Patel

Applicant

West Kenya Sugar Company Ltd

Respondent

Credit Bank Ltd

Respondent

Panachand Jivraj Shah

Respondent

Hansraj Fulchand Gudka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution should be heard by the present bench given the disqualification of one judge.
  2. 2 Whether the interim stay previously granted should be extended pending the hearing before a reconstituted bench.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for stay of execution could not proceed as scheduled because one member of the bench, Shah JA, disqualified himself from hearing the matter. In the interests of justice and to ensure a fair hearing, the court ordered that the application be removed from the day's list and be set down for hearing before a differently constituted bench. To prevent prejudice to the applicant, the interim stay previously granted was extended until the application is heard. The court also directed that the matter be given priority in re-listing, and that the costs for the day be in the application.

Court Disposition

Application stood over for hearing before a reconstituted bench; interim stay extended; costs in the application.

Orders

  • The application is taken out of today's hearing list and is to be refixed at the registry on a priority basis before a bench excluding Shah JA.
  • The interim stay granted on 6th December, 2000 is extended until the application is heard.