[2021] KEELC 3775 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3775 (KLR)

The court found that the application was incompetent as it was filed as a stand-alone miscellaneous application outside the main cause, lacked annexed copies of the bills of costs and the impugned decision of the Deputy Registrar, and there was no evidence of service on the respondents. Consequently, the court was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3775 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jayesh Autospares Ltd; Respondent: Kapterit Rapid Co. Ltd; Respondent: John Wepukhuku Waliaula; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 1 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Reference
Outcome
application struck out
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Bills of Costs, Reference to Deputy Registrar
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Bills of Costs Reference to Deputy Registrar

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jayesh Autospares Ltd

Applicant

Kapterit Rapid Co. Ltd

Respondent

John Wepukhuku Waliaula

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Reference

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution and reference was properly before the court.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of annexed bills of costs and the impugned decision rendered the application incompetent.
  3. 3 Whether the application should be struck out for want of service or evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was incompetent as it was filed as a stand-alone miscellaneous application outside the main cause, lacked annexed copies of the bills of costs and the impugned decision of the Deputy Registrar, and there was no evidence of service on the respondents. Consequently, the court was not in a position to hear and determine the application and struck it out. The court also vacated all interim orders previously granted, and made no order as to costs due to lack of evidence of service and absence of a response from the respondents.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out.
  • All interim orders issued on 15/1/2021 are vacated.