[2014] KEELRC 737 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 737 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to communicate its decision not to renew the claimant's fixed term contract before its expiry, despite the claimant's compliance with the contractual requirement to apply for renewal six months in advance. This omission created a legitimate expectation of renewal or, at...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 737 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jayne Kanini Mwanza; Respondent: National Water Conservation and Pipeline Corporation
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 25 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant in part
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Fixed Term Contracts, Legitimate Expectation, Termination Notice, Compensation for Termination, Leave Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Fixed Term Contracts Legitimate Expectation Termination Notice Compensation for Termination Leave Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jayne Kanini Mwanza

Applicant

National Water Conservation and Pipeline Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was obligated to communicate its decision on contract renewal before expiry of the claimant's fixed term contract.
  2. 2 Whether failure to communicate amounted to unfair termination or constructive renewal.
  3. 3 What remedies the claimant is entitled to for the respondent's failure to provide timely notice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to communicate its decision not to renew the claimant's fixed term contract before its expiry, despite the claimant's compliance with the contractual requirement to apply for renewal six months in advance. This omission created a legitimate expectation of renewal or, at minimum, entitled the claimant to proper notice of termination. The court held that the respondent's belated communication amounted to unfair termination, warranting compensation. The employment contract entitled either party to three months' notice or payment in lieu thereof. The court awarded the claimant three months' salary as notice, three months' salary as compensation for...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant in part

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 750,000 being three months' notice as per the contract.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 918,000 being three months' salary as compensation.