[2009] KEHC 1365 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 1365 (KLR)

The court held that the procedure adopted—determining the suit by written submissions without adducing evidence—was irregular and potentially prejudicial to the parties. Since no evidence had been adduced and no directions had been taken to allow affidavit evidence, the court found it necessary for the matter to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 1365 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jayne Wanjiku Mwangi; Defendant: City Council of Nairobi; Defendant: Teresiah Onyango
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 658 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Pre Trial Directions
Outcome
Case to proceed to full trial; hearing dates to be taken.
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Title Revocation, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctions Title Revocation Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jayne Wanjiku Mwangi

Plaintiff

City Council of Nairobi

Defendant

Teresiah Onyango

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Pre Trial Directions

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from repossessing or revoking her title to Plot No.B6-221 Kayole, Nairobi.
  2. 2 Whether the procedure of determining the suit by written submissions without adducing evidence is proper.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the procedure adopted—determining the suit by written submissions without adducing evidence—was irregular and potentially prejudicial to the parties. Since no evidence had been adduced and no directions had been taken to allow affidavit evidence, the court found it necessary for the matter to proceed to full trial. The parties must call evidence to resolve the factual disputes regarding the plaintiff's entitlement to the suit property and the propriety of the defendants' actions. The court directed that hearing dates be taken for the main suit to ensure a fair and proper determination of the issues.

Court Disposition

Case to proceed to full trial; hearing dates to be taken.

Orders

  • Counsel to take hearing dates for the hearing of the main suit.