[2008] KEHC 1925 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 1925 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the reinstatement of the order dated 30/3/2001. After considering the affidavits and submissions by counsel, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application in full, including the reinstatement of the previous order and awarding...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 1925 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jedida Ruguru Ngari; Respondent: Prisca Marigu Ngari
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 29 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed. All orders sought granted.
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Orders, Costs in the Cause
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Reinstatement of Orders Costs in the Cause

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jedida Ruguru Ngari

Applicant

Prisca Marigu Ngari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the order dated 30/3/2001 should be reinstated.
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded in the cause.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the reinstatement of the order dated 30/3/2001. After considering the affidavits and submissions by counsel, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application in full, including the reinstatement of the previous order and awarding costs in the cause. The decision was based on the principles of justice and the court's inherent powers under the Civil Procedure Act to ensure fair adjudication of matters before it.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. All orders sought granted.

Orders

  • The order dated 30/3/2001 is hereby reinstated.
  • Costs in the cause.