[2018] KEELC 919 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 919 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant may not have been properly served with summons in the original proceedings, as no affidavit of service was annexed by the respondent. Guided by Article 50(1) of the Constitution, the court held that the applicant is entitled to a fair hearing and should not be condemned unheard....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 919 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Jelliah Ayieni; Applicant: Julius Mwangi Mworia t/a Companion Kenya Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 287 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Service of Summons, Right to Fair Hearing
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Service of Summons Right to Fair Hearing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jelliah Ayieni

Respondent

Julius Mwangi Mworia t/a Companion Kenya Limited

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the landlord/applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the ruling and consequential orders in Nairobi Rent Restriction Case No. 719 of 2015 should be set aside, reviewed, or varied.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant was properly served with summons in the original proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant may not have been properly served with summons in the original proceedings, as no affidavit of service was annexed by the respondent. Guided by Article 50(1) of the Constitution, the court held that the applicant is entitled to a fair hearing and should not be condemned unheard. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to the landlord/applicant to file an appeal out of time and ordered a stay of execution pending the filing of the appeal, with the appeal to be filed within thirty days. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the landlord/applicant to file appeal out of time.
  • There shall be a stay of execution pending the filing of the appeal.