[2015] KEELC 145 (KLR)
The court found that the dispute could not be resolved without technical evidence regarding the physical location of the plots. Given that both parties claim different plot numbers but the same physical location, and that the Defendant did not oppose the application except to request a government surveyor, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELC 145 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jemima Wanjiru Kaboro (Suing as Administrator of the estate of Samuel Kaboro); Defendant: Eva Kamau
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 474 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Survey Report
- Outcome
- Application allowed; survey ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Land Allocation Disputes, Survey and Boundaries, Ownership Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jemima Wanjiru Kaboro (Suing as Administrator of the estate of Samuel Kaboro)
Plaintiff
Eva Kamau
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Survey Report
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the physical location of Plot No. 255 and Plot No. F315 can be ascertained to resolve the dispute between the parties.
- 2 Whether a court order should be issued for a surveyor to determine the actual location of the disputed plots.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dispute could not be resolved without technical evidence regarding the physical location of the plots. Given that both parties claim different plot numbers but the same physical location, and that the Defendant did not oppose the application except to request a government surveyor, the court held that a survey by the Department of Surveys of Kenya, in conjunction with Embakasi Ranching Company Limited, was necessary. The court ordered that a survey be conducted to establish the physical locations of the plots in issue and that a report be filed within 60 days. Both parties were ordered to share the surveyor's fees equally. The costs of the application were ordered...
Court Disposition
Application allowed; survey ordered.
Orders
- A Surveyor from the Department of Surveys of Kenya, in conjunction with Embakasi Ranching Company Limited, to undertake a survey exercise to establish the physical locations of the plots in issue.
- A report to be filed within 60 days of the date of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
39 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
ELC NO. 474 OF 2012
JEMIMA WANJIRU KABORO
(Suing as Administrator of the estate of SAMUEL KABORO)........PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
EVA KAMAU...............................................................................................DEFENDANT
RULING
The parties herein lay claim to a plot within Embakasi Ranching Company Limited.The Plaintiff claims to have been allocated plot is No. 255 whereas the Defendant claims to have purchased Plot No. F315 and constructed a permanent house thereon. Interestingly, both parties claim different parcels of land but situated on the same physical location. The Plaintiff in her application dated 12th August 2013 prays that Embakasi Ranching Company Ltd together with their appointed surveyors be ordered to present a report to the Court on the physical locations of the plots in issue, that is, P.255 and P. 315 and specifically the plot that is currently occupied by the Defendant.
The application is grounded on the fact that the dispute concerns the actual physical location of the two plots, which cannot be resolved except by the technical evidence of a surveyor assisted by the offices of Embakasi Ranching Company Limited, the custodian of maps, survey plans, plot numbers and other particulars necessary to resolve this dispute. Further, that once the location of the plots are resolved, the suit will be automatically be determined.
The Defendant did not oppose the application save that the Court does make an order that a Government Surveyor to undertake the exercise instead of a private surveyor.
I have considered the application and I do find it merited. The order of the Court is as follows:
A Surveyor from the Department of Surveys of Kenya, in conjunction with Embakasi Ranching Company Limited do undertake a survey exercise to establish the physical locations of the plots in issue. Thereafter, a report be filed within 60 days of the date hereof.
Both parties shall meet the Surveyor’s fees equally.
Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
Dated, Signed and Delivered this 5th day of June,2015
L.GACHERU
JUDGE
In the Presence of:-
None attendance for the Plaintiff/Applicant
Mr Omuga holding brief Mr Ndegwa for the Defendant/Respondent
Hilda: Court Clerk
L. GACHERU
JUDGE
Mr Omuga : Mr Ndegwa was served with the Ruling Notice by the Court.
L.GACHERU
JUDGE
Court:
Since there is no Return of Service for Mr Njuguna for the Plaintiff, Mr Ndegwa to serve Mr Njuguna with a Notice of Ruling herein.
L.GACHERU
JUDGE
5/6/2015
Court:
Matter to be mentioned on 5thAugust 2015 to confirm the filing of the Surveyor’s Report.
Mention Notice to issue.
L.GACHERU
JUDGE
5/6/2015