[2014] KEHC 753 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case for the grant of a temporary injunction. The evidence showed that the suit land was at risk of being alienated by the defendant in breach of an agreement between the parties. The court applied the principles under Order 40 of the Civil Procedure...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 753 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jemimah Kiura Zafania; Defendant: Wambu Gatumu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 82 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- temporary injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Temporary Injunctions, Status Quo Preservation, Land Disputes, Interlocutory Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jemimah Kiura Zafania
Plaintiff
Wambu Gatumu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from disposing or alienating land parcel Mbeere/Mbita/4783 pending the hearing of the main suit.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff has met the evidentiary threshold for the grant of a temporary injunction under Order 40 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case for the grant of a temporary injunction. The evidence showed that the suit land was at risk of being alienated by the defendant in breach of an agreement between the parties. The court applied the principles under Order 40 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, which authorize the issuance of temporary injunctions to preserve the status quo pending the determination of the main suit. The absence of any response or opposition from the defendant further supported the plaintiff's case. Consequently, the court granted the temporary injunction as sought in prayer 2 of the notice of motion.
Court Disposition
temporary injunction granted
Orders
- The plaintiff/applicant is granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendant/respondent from disposing, alienating, or otherwise dealing with land reference number Mbeere/Mbita/4783 pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.
- Costs of the application shall be costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
E.L.C. NO 82 OF 2014
JEMIMAH KIURA ZAFANIA.................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
WAMBU GATUMU.............................................DEFENDANT
RULING
INTRODUCTION
By her notice of motion dated 9th October 2014, the plaintiff/applicant has applied to this court for a temporary injunction to stop the defendant/respondent from disposing, alienating and/or anybody else from dealing with land reference number Mbeere/Mbita/4783 pending the hearing of the main suit. In support of that application, the plaintiff/applicant has attached a supporting affidavit.
The defendant/respondent was served with the notice of hearing of this motion. An affidavit of service dated 11th November, 2014 was duly filed which showed that the defendant was served with a hearing notice. He did not attend the court for the hearing of this motion. The hearing therefore proceeded in his absence.
The Case for the Plaintiff/Applicant
According to the plaintiff/applicant, she was the owner of the suit land which was part of land parcel number Mbeere/Mbita/227. She has stated that this parcel of land has been subdivided into the following parcels of land:
Parcel number Mbeere/Mbita/4783 which is now registered I the name of the defendant/respondent.
Parcel number Mbeere/Mbita/4782 which is still in her name.
It is her evidence that they had agreed that the plaintiff would exchange her portion of land with a portion of the defendant. She says that the defendant/respondent has refused to exchange his piece of land with that of the plaintiff.
She further fears that the defendant will alienate the suit land in breach of the original agreement.
The Applicable Law:
The law governing the grant of temporary orders is set out in Order 40 of the Civil Procedure Rules of 2010. In terms of those provisions, the court is authorized to issue a temporary injunction to preserve the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the suit. This is particularly so where it is shown that there is danger that the suit land may be disposed off before the main suit is heard. The plaintiff has met the evidentiary threshold for the grant of a temporary injunction.
Verdict and Disposal Order:
In the light of the foregoing:
The plaintiff/applicant is hereby granted the order in terms of prayer 2 of her notice of motion.
Costs of this application shall be costs in cause.
RULING DATED, SIGNEDand DELIVERED in open court at EMBU this …..10th .......day of …..December,...2014
In the presence of
The plaintiff/applicant and in the absence of the defendant/respondent
Court clerk Mr Muriithi
Right of Appeal explained under Order 43 of Civil Procedure Rules 2010 inter-parties.
J.M. BWONWONGA
JUDGE