[2015] KEHC 2253 (KLR)
The court found that there was no longer any dispute between the parties regarding the distribution of the deceased's estate, as both the petitioner and the protestor, along with the other beneficiaries, had agreed to the protestor's proposed mode of distribution. The court noted that the proposal was consistent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 2253 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki; Respondent: Kenneth Wachira Mwaniki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 34 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Protest allowed; grant confirmed; estate to be distributed as per protestor's proposal; each party to bear own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Distribution of Property, Confirmation of Grant, Beneficiary Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki
Applicant
Kenneth Wachira Mwaniki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased's estate should devolve solely to the petitioner or be distributed among all beneficiaries as proposed by the protestor.
- 2 Whether the protestor's proposal for distribution reflects the agreement of all parties.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no longer any dispute between the parties regarding the distribution of the deceased's estate, as both the petitioner and the protestor, along with the other beneficiaries, had agreed to the protestor's proposed mode of distribution. The court noted that the proposal was consistent with the interests of all beneficiaries and was a departure from the petitioner's initial position. In light of the consensus, the court allowed the protest, confirmed the grant, and ordered that the estate be distributed in accordance with the protestor's proposal as set out in the affidavit of protest sworn on 17th February, 2014. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
Protest allowed; grant confirmed; estate to be distributed as per protestor's proposal; each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- The protest is allowed.
- The grant is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
60 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 34 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE JACOB MWANIKI KARUKUNGIaliasMWANIKI JACOB KARUKUNGI
JEMIMAH WANJIRU MWANIKI…………………….PETITIONER
VERSUS
KENNETH WACHIRA MWANIKI…………………….PROTESTOR
JUDGMENT
Jacob Mwangi Karukungi (herein “the deceased”) died on 30th August, 2009. According to the petition filed on 19th January, 2012 in succession of his estate, the deceased was survived by his wife the petitioner herein and four children one of whom is the protestor.
The affidavit filed in support of the petition shows that the deceased’s estate comprised the following assets:-
Kagaari/Kigaa/2910 measuring 0. 74 acres
Kagaari/Kanja/2735 measuring 3. 30 acres
Kagaari/Kanja/2640 measuring 3. 80 acres
Kagaari/Kanja/2639 measuring 3. 20 acres
Kagaari/Kanja/6317 measuring 0. 12 acres
Kagaari/Kanja/5809 measuring 0. 24 acres
Nyeri Municipality/Block 1/234
Motor Vehicle Registration Number KVW 711 (Datsun Pick-Up)
Barclays Bank Ordinary Shares, Account No. 0019085
Standard Chartered Bank Ordinary Shares, Account No.0004805
Kenya Airways Ordinary shares, Account No.0040723
Kenya Commercial Bank Account No. 041-101099832
Barclays Bank Account No. 4083205
The grant of letters of administration intestate of the deceased’s estate was made to his widow, the petitioner herein. In the affidavit in support of the summons for confirmation of grant dated 28th November, 2012 the administratrix proposed to have the entire estate devolve upon herself. The rest of the beneficiaries consent to this proposed distribution except the protestor.
In his affidavit of protest filed in court on 17th February, 2014 he deposed that the estate should be distributed amongst all the deceased’s survivors and beneficiaries to his estate and in particular he proposed that the estate should be shared out as follows:-
Kagaari/Kigaa/2910 to be registered in the name of Kenneth Wachira absolutely;
Kagaari/Kanja/2735 to be registered in the name of Janice Muthoni Massimo absolutely;
Kagaari/Kanja/2640 to be registered in the name of Lucy Njeri Mwaniki absolutely;
Kagaari/Kanja/2639 to be registered in the name of Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki subject to her life interest;
Kagaari/Kanja/6317 acres to be registered in the name of Kenneth Wachira absolutely;
Kagaari/Kanja/5809 measuring 0. 24 acres, to be registered in the name of Sally Wanja Ndegwa;
Nyeri Municipality/Block 1/234, to be registered in the name of Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki.
The protestor proposed the movable assets to be distributed as follows:-
Motor Vehicle Registration Number KVW 711 (Datsun Pick-Up) to be registered in the name of Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki;
Barclays Bank Ordinary Shares, Account No. 0019085 to be transferred to Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki;
Standard Chartered Bank Ordinary Shares, Account No. 0004805 to be transferred to Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki;
Kenya Airways Ordinary shares, Account No.0040723 to be transferred to Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki;
Money in Kenya Commercial Bank Account No. 041-101099832 to be shared out amongst all the beneficiaries; and,
Money in Barclays Bank Account No. 4083205, to be shared out equally amongst all the beneficiaries.
On 4th February, 2015, parties took directions to the effect that the protest be disposed of by way of written submissions which they subsequently filed.
I have considered these submissions and all I gather is that parties are in agreement that the estate should be distributed as proposed by the protestor; in essence, therefore, there is no dispute for this court to determine. For avoidance of doubt this is what counsel for the petitioner/administratrix said in his submissions:-
“Your Lordship, this is a 2012 petition being dragged for no reason at all. Therefore the estate should be distributed as earlier proposed by our letter of 29th September, 2014 and confirmed by the protestor’s advocate’s letter of 9th October, 2014 on the following distributions:-
1. Jemimah Wanjiru Mwaniki to inherit
(a) Kagaari/Kanja/2639 (b) Nyeri Municipality/Block I/234
(c) Motor vehicle KVW 711 (d) Shares in Barclays and Commercial Banks
2. Sally Wanja Ndegwa to inherit
(a) Kagaari/Kigaa/5809
3. Kenneth Wachira Mwaniki to inherit
(a) Kagaari/Kigaa/2910
(b) Kagaari/Kanja/6217(sic)
4. Lucy Njeri Mwaniki to inherit
(a) Kagaari/Kanja/2640
5. Janice Muthoni Massimo to inherit
(a) Kagaari/Kanja/2735
6. Monies in Barclays Bank and Kenya Commercial Bank Limited to be shared in equal shares to the 5 beneficiaries.”
This proposal is obviously a departure from the administratrix’s earlier proposal on distribution of the deceased’s estate as elicited in her affidavit in support of the summons for confirmation of grant; it is however, consistent with the protestor’s proposal for distribution of the same estate.
In these circumstances, I would allow the protest; the grant is confirmed and the estate shall be distributed as proposed in paragraph 6 (a) to (i) of the affidavit of protest sworn on 17th February, 2014. Parties will bear their own respective costs.
Signed, dated and delivered in open court this 9th day of October, 2015.
Ngaah Jairus
JUDGE