[2025] KEHC 16993 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 16993 (KLR)

The court allowed the substitution of advocates for the applicant as the previous advocates had died and there was no objection to the application. The court further directed that the bill of costs dated 2/10/2019 be placed before the current Deputy Registrar for re-taxation, as the prayer for a different Deputy...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 16993 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Iueni Jenkins; Respondent: Disciplinary Committee Law Society of Kenya 1989; Interested Party: Ambrose Rachier; Interested Party: Rachier & Amolo Advocates; Interested Party: Hardew Sigh Pali; Interested Party: Law Society Of Kenya; Interested Party: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application 639 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Advocates and Directions on Bill of Costs
Outcome
Application for substitution of advocates allowed; directions given for taxation of costs.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Substitution of Advocates, Taxation of Costs, Court Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Substitution of Advocates Taxation of Costs Court Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Iueni Jenkins

Applicant

Disciplinary Committee Law Society of Kenya 1989

Respondent

Ambrose Rachier

Interested Party

Rachier & Amolo Advocates

Interested Party

Hardew Sigh Pali

Interested Party

Law Society Of Kenya

Interested Party

Attorney General

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Advocates and Directions on Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's advocates may be substituted due to the death of previous advocates.
  2. 2 Whether the bill of costs dated 2/10/2019 should be placed before a different Deputy Registrar for taxation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed the substitution of advocates for the applicant as the previous advocates had died and there was no objection to the application. The court further directed that the bill of costs dated 2/10/2019 be placed before the current Deputy Registrar for re-taxation, as the prayer for a different Deputy Registrar was overtaken by events due to staff changes. The court issued directions for mention before the Deputy Registrar to fix a date for taxation.

Court Disposition

Application for substitution of advocates allowed; directions given for taxation of costs.

Orders

  • The firm of DRO Ngala & Partners is substituted as advocates for the applicant in place of Kimanga & Co. Advocates.
  • The file is taken to the Deputy Registrar to fix a date for re-taxation of the bill of costs dated 2/10/2019.