[2018] KEELC 4773 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4773 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had entered into valid and enforceable sale agreements with the defendants for the purchase of 1.54 acres of land, paid the full purchase price, and took possession of the land. The defendants did not deny the terms of the agreements and failed to facilitate the transfer of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4773 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jenniffer Syokau Mutie; Defendant: Grace Mwithi Maundu; Defendant: G.K. & D Co. Ltd
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 146 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
plaintiff's claim allowed in full
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Land Sale Agreements, Title Transfer, Land Control Board Consent
Source Language
en
Land and Property Specific Performance Land Sale Agreements Title Transfer Land Control Board Consent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jenniffer Syokau Mutie

Plaintiff

Grace Mwithi Maundu

Defendant

G.K. & D Co. Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to 1.54 acres of land purchased from the defendants as per the sale agreements.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants breached the sale agreement by failing to transfer the land and obtain necessary consents.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief and specific performance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had entered into valid and enforceable sale agreements with the defendants for the purchase of 1.54 acres of land, paid the full purchase price, and took possession of the land. The defendants did not deny the terms of the agreements and failed to facilitate the transfer of the land or obtain the necessary consents from the Land Control Board. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance, including the transfer of the land, the obtaining of Land Control Board consent, and the issuance of a title deed. The court also found that the plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief to protect her possession and enjoyment of the land. In...

Court Disposition

plaintiff's claim allowed in full

Orders

  • Declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to 1.54 acres out of plot number 1602H, Lukenya Ranching and Farming Co-operative Society Limited.
  • Order compelling the 1st defendant to transfer 1.54 acres to the plaintiff as per the sale agreements.