https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3061

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3061

The court held that the incorrect entry of the month at the foot of the judgment was an accidental slip within section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act and therefore corrected the error by substituting September with October to reflect the true date of the judgment delivered on 7th October 2025.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 3061 (KLR)
Parties
1 ST PLAINTIFF: FLORENCE JEPKOSGEI; 2 ND PLAINTIFF: ROBERT KIPROP; 3 RD PLAINTIFF: MERCY JELAGAT; 4 TH PLAINTIFF: GEOFFREY KIPTOO; 1 ST DEFENDANT: JOHNSON KIPROTICH MAIYO; 2 ND DEFENDANT: WILLIAM KIPNGETICH MAIYO
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Case E022 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Matter / Ruling on Correction of Accidental Slip in Judgment
Outcome
Allowed; accidental slip corrected.
Judges
["GMA Ongondo"]
Legal Topics
Accidental Slip Rule, Correction of Clerical Error, Section 99 Civil Procedure Act, Judgment Correction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land Law Judicial Practice Accidental Slip Rule Correction of Clerical Error Section 99 Civil Procedure Act Judgment Correction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FLORENCE JEPKOSGEI

1 ST PLAINTIFF

ROBERT KIPROP

2 ND PLAINTIFF

MERCY JELAGAT

3 RD PLAINTIFF

GEOFFREY KIPTOO

4 TH PLAINTIFF

JOHNSON KIPROTICH MAIYO

1 ST DEFENDANT

WILLIAM KIPNGETICH MAIYO

2 ND DEFENDANT

Procedural Posture

Civil Land Matter / Ruling on Correction of Accidental Slip in Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court could correct the month stated at the foot of the judgment from September to October.
  2. 2 Whether the error amounted to an accidental slip or clerical mistake under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the incorrect entry of the month at the foot of the judgment was an accidental slip within section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act and therefore corrected the error by substituting September with October to reflect the true date of the judgment delivered on 7th October 2025.

Court Disposition

Allowed; accidental slip corrected.

Orders

  • The month 'September' at the foot of the judgment is corrected and replaced with 'October'.
  • The judgment date remains 7th October 2025.