[2000] KECA 353 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 353 (KLR)

The Court, upon being satisfied that both parties consented to the withdrawal of the application, marked the application as withdrawn and awarded costs to the applicant. The decision was based on the mutual agreement of the parties and the established principle that costs follow the event unless otherwise agreed or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 353 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Air France; Respondent: Rono Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 24 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Withdrawal of Application by Consent
Outcome
Application withdrawn by consent with costs to the applicant.
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Costs Award, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Withdrawal of Application Costs Award Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Air France

Applicant

Rono Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Withdrawal of Application by Consent

  1. 1 Whether the application should be withdrawn by consent of the parties.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the withdrawn application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court, upon being satisfied that both parties consented to the withdrawal of the application, marked the application as withdrawn and awarded costs to the applicant. The decision was based on the mutual agreement of the parties and the established principle that costs follow the event unless otherwise agreed or ordered.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn by consent with costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • The application is marked as withdrawn by consent of both parties.
  • Costs awarded to the applicant.