[2020] KEELC 1718 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, being in occupation of the suit land and having been served with a notice of eviction, stands to suffer substantial loss if the stay is not granted. The application was not unduly delayed, as the period for vacating the land lapsed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 1718 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Jeremiah Mugendi Kiambi; Respondent: Joseph Murori Kabari; Respondent: Another (unnamed)
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 3 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Conditional stay of execution granted.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss, Security for Due Performance, Eviction Orders, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeremiah Mugendi Kiambi
Appellant
Joseph Murori Kabari
Respondent
Another (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if the stay is not granted.
- 3 Whether the application for stay was made without unreasonable delay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, being in occupation of the suit land and having been served with a notice of eviction, stands to suffer substantial loss if the stay is not granted. The application was not unduly delayed, as the period for vacating the land lapsed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted court operations. However, the applicant had not offered any security for the due performance of the decree. Balancing these factors, the court exercised its discretion to grant a conditional stay of execution, requiring the applicant to deposit KES 500,000 as security within 30 days, failing which the stay would lapse. The stay is to last for one year, and the applicant is to...
Court Disposition
Conditional stay of execution granted.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment in Githongo PMCC No. 42 of 2015 granted on condition that the applicant deposits KES 500,000 in court within 30 days, failing which the stay shall lapse.
- The stay granted shall last for one year.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU
ELC APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2020
JEREMIAH MUGENDI KIAMBI........................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
JOSEPH MURORI KABARI & ANOTHER....................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Vide the application dated 28. 5.2020, applicant seeks an order of stay of execution of the judgment in Githongo PMCC No. 42 of 2015 pending the hearing and determination of an appeal.
2. Applicant avers that he was aggrieved by the decision of the trial court and he has been served with a notice of eviction. He contends that he is in possession of the suit land. He has relied on the case of S.M Githunguri vs Jimbacredit corporationLtd (2) 1988 eKLR.
3. The respondents have opposed the application via the replying affidavit of the 2nd respondent. It is averred that the judgment was delivered on 18. 12. 2019 and applicant was given 5 months to vacate the suit land but has refused to comply. It is also averred that applicant has another parcel of land No. Abothuguchi/Kiija/3 where he can relocate to. It is also contended that applicant has not provided any security.
4. I have considered all the issues raised herein and the submissions of the parties. Order 42 rule 6 (2) of the civil procedure rules provide that:
“No order for stay of execution shall be made under sub-rule (1) unless—(a) the court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable delay; and (b) such security as the court orders for the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant”.
5. To grant or to refuse an application for stay of execution pending appeal is discretionary in that the court when granting a stay, it has to balance the interests of the applicant with those of the respondent. In determining this balance, the court gives due consideration to the three criteria set under order 42 rule 6 (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, that is to say:
(1) Whether appellant stands to suffer substantial loss,
(2) Whether the application has been brought without delay and
(3) Whether there is security.
6. On the issue of substantial loss, Gikonyo J in Wangalwa & another vs Agnes Naliaka Cheseto Misc. application no. 42 of 2011 (2012) eKLR stated that;
“The appellant must establish other state of affairs that will irreparably affect or negate the very essential core of the applicant as the successful party in the appeal”.
7. It has emerged that the applicant is the one in occupation of the suit land and he has been served with a notice of eviction. I do find that he stands to suffer substantial loss if the application is not allowed.
8. On the issue of delay, I find that the applicant had apparently been given three months to vacate the land, which period can be termed as a stay of the judgment. The period lapsed on 18. 3.2020, whereby the uncertainty in courts operations had set in due to the covid 19 pandemic.
9. On the issue of security, I note that applicant has offered none.
10. In the circumstances, I proceed to grant a conditional stay of execution of the judgment in the following terms:
(1) There is to be a stay of execution of the judgment in Githongo PMCC No. 42 of 2015 on condition that applicant deposits in court security amounting to Shs.500,000 within 30 days, failure to which the order for stay shall lapse.
(2) The stay granted herein shall last a period of one year.
(3) The DR to call for the lower court file.
(4) Applicant is to meet the costs of this application.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2020
HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE
ORDER
The date of delivery of this ruling was given on 29. 6.2020. In light of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to the COVID-19 pandemicand following the practice directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice dated 17th March, 2020 and published in the Kenya Gazette of 17th April 2020 as Gazette Notice no.3137, this ruling has been delivered to the parties by electronic mail. They are deemed to have waived compliance with order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court.
HON. LUCY N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE