[1996] KECA 21 (KLR)

[1996] KECA 21 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that the failure to include a certified copy of the order sought to be appealed against in the record of appeal is a fatal defect under rule 85(i)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules. This omission renders the appeal incompetent and defective, warranting its striking out. The court emphasized...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] KECA 21 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jerome Mwathi Kaumbulu; Appellant: Professor J. K. Maitha; Respondent: Sila Husyimi Ndolo
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 119 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Order Striking Out Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent.
Judges
GS Pall
Legal Topics
Appeal Record Requirements, Striking Out Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Record Requirements Striking Out Appeal Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jerome Mwathi Kaumbulu

Appellant

Professor J. K. Maitha

Appellant

Sila Husyimi Ndolo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Order Striking Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is competent in the absence of a certified copy of the order appealed against as required by the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the failure to include a certified copy of the order sought to be appealed against in the record of appeal is a fatal defect under rule 85(i)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules. This omission renders the appeal incompetent and defective, warranting its striking out. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of the procedural requirement and found no basis to excuse non-compliance. Consequently, the appeal was struck out for want of compliance with the rules.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out for failure to comply with rule 85(i)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  • No order as to costs.