[2023] KEHC 350 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that the respondent was served with certificates of taxed costs, which remained unsatisfied. There was no dispute as to retainer or any other objection raised by the respondent, who failed to respond or attend the hearing despite service. The court was satisfied...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 350 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: J.G. Kariuki t/a Gachiri Kariuki & Company Advocates; Respondent: Invesco Assurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 77 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed
- Judges
- OA Sewe
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bills, Judgment on Certificates of Costs, Consolidation of Matters
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J.G. Kariuki t/a Gachiri Kariuki & Company Advocates
Applicant
Invesco Assurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment on the basis of taxed and certified costs against the respondent.
- 2 Whether the various taxed matters between the parties should be consolidated for expedient disposal.
- 3 Whether the respondent, having been served, is liable for costs and interest as sought by the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that the respondent was served with certificates of taxed costs, which remained unsatisfied. There was no dispute as to retainer or any other objection raised by the respondent, who failed to respond or attend the hearing despite service. The court was satisfied that the requirements of section 51(2) of the Advocates Act had been met, justifying entry of judgment for the applicant in the total sum of the certified costs, together with interest at court rates and costs of the application. The consolidation of the various taxed matters was warranted for expedient disposal, as they arose from similar facts and issues of law.
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed
Orders
- The various taxed matters between the applicant and respondent are consolidated for expedient disposal.
- Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant for Kshs 3,835,131.77 together with interest at court rates from the date hereof until full payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
J.G. Kariuki t/a Gachiri Kariuki & Company Advocates v Invesco Assurance Company Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application 77 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 350 (KLR) (30 January 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 350 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Miscellaneous Civil Application 77 of 2022
OA Sewe, J
January 30, 2023
Between
J.G. Kariuki t/a Gachiri Kariuki & Company Advocates
Plaintiff
and
Invesco Assurance Company Limited
Defendant
Ruling
1. Before the court for determination is the notice of motion dated February 25, 2022. It was filed by advocate J G Kariuki, t/a Gachiri Kariuki & Co Advocates pursuant to section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act, chapter 16 of the Laws of Kenya as well as sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya and order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, for orders that:a.The various taxed matters between the advocate/applicant and the client/respondent as listed at paragraph 1 of the said application be consolidated for expedient disposal.b.Judgment be entered in favour of the advocate/applicant in the sum of Kshs 3,835,131. 77 plus interest thereon at court rates from the date hereof until full payment.c.Costs of the application be provided for in the sum of Kshs 20,000/= per certificate of costs.
2. The application was based on the grounds that outstanding legal fees between the applicant and the respondent have been taxed and certified by the court in various miscellaneous applications whose sum total comes to Kshs 3,835,131. 77, and that the court has issued certificates of costs in those matters. It was further the contention of the applicant that, he has served the respondent with the certificates of costs through its head office in Nairobi, but that the respondent has failed and/or neglected to satisfy the certificates; thereby rendering the filing of this application necessary.
3. The application was supported by the affidavit of John Gachiri Kariuki, advocate. He deposed that his firm, M/s Gachiri Kariuki & Company Advocates, was instructed by the respondent to represent it in various civil matters; and upon failure to pay his legal fees on demand, he filed advocate/client bills of costs and the same were taxed as per the list of 55 miscellaneous applications appended to paragraph 1 of the applicant’s notice of motion dated February 25, 2022. He annexed to his supporting affidavit copies of each of the individual certificates of costs as annexure “JGK 1”.
4. Thus, Mr Kariuki prayed that, since the matters all arise out of similar facts and issues of law, it is only fair, just, prudent and expedient that they be consolidated for purposes of this application. He also prayed that judgment be entered in his favour in the total sum of the certificates, being Kshs 3,835,131. 77 plus costs and interest.
5. Although the application was duly served on the respondent, no response was filed thereto by the company. The matter was consequently listed for hearing on May 9, 2022 and directions given that hearing notice be served on the respondent; which was done by the applicant. The respondent did not attend court for hearing on May 9, 2022 in spite of service; whereupon hearing proceeded ex parte in the presence of counsel for the applicant, Mr Origi.
6. I have considered the application and the grounds upon which it was predicated. Having perused the averments set out in the supporting affidavit and the certificates of costs annexed thereto, i am satisfied that a justification has been made to warrant the issuance of the orders sought. In the premises, it is hereby ordered that:a.The various taxed matters between the applicant and respondent as aforementioned be and are hereby consolidated for expedient disposal.b.Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the applicant on the basis of the certificates of costs exhibited herein in the total sum of Kshs 3,835,131. 77 together with interest thereon at court rates from the date hereof until full payment.c.Costs of the application, to be approved by the deputy registrar, be borne by the respondent.
7. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT MOMBASA THIS 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023. ............................OLGA SEWEJUDGE