[2024] KEHC 4734 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 4734 (KLR)

The court held that since the caution and charge over the suit property are registered in favour of third parties (LM, DM, and Industrial & Commercial Credit Development Corporation), and there is no evidence that these parties have been served with the application seeking to lift the caution, it would be contrary...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 4734 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: JGK; Respondent: FWK
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 19 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Directions After Judgment and Pending Application
Outcome
Directions issued; application not determined on merits pending service and responses.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Property Distribution, Cautions on Land, Service of Process, Land Charges
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Matrimonial Property Distribution Cautions on Land Service of Process Land Charges

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JGK

Applicant

FWK

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Directions After Judgment and Pending Application

  1. 1 Whether the caution registered in favour of LM and DM over LR. Kianjai/mituntu/257 should be lifted without serving them.
  2. 2 Whether the application to lift the caution can proceed without affording affected parties an opportunity to be heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the caution and charge over the suit property are registered in favour of third parties (LM, DM, and Industrial & Commercial Credit Development Corporation), and there is no evidence that these parties have been served with the application seeking to lift the caution, it would be contrary to the principles of natural justice to proceed and make orders affecting their interests without hearing them. The court therefore directed the applicant to serve the application on all affected parties, granted timelines for responses and further affidavits, and scheduled a mention to fix a ruling date after compliance.

Court Disposition

Directions issued; application not determined on merits pending service and responses.

Orders

  • Plaintiff/Applicant to serve the application dated 14th December, 2023 on LM, DM, and Industrial & Commercial Credit Development Corporation within 14 days.
  • Upon service, LM, DM, and Industrial & Commercial Credit Development Corporation to file and serve responses within 14 days.