[2024] KEHC 11633 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 11633 (KLR)

The court held that the application for release of funds was improperly before it, as the funds were deposited in the lower court file CMCC No. 276 of 2018 following a consent between the parties. The present miscellaneous application was only for leave to appeal out of time, and not the substantive appeal or the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 11633 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Limited; Respondent: Eliud Maelo Wafula
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 27 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion for Release of Deposited Funds
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Release of Deposited Funds, Jurisdiction of Court, Procedural Misplacement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Release of Deposited Funds Jurisdiction of Court Procedural Misplacement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Limited

Applicant

Eliud Maelo Wafula

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion for Release of Deposited Funds

  1. 1 Whether the High Court in this miscellaneous application has jurisdiction to order the release of funds deposited in a joint account pursuant to a consent in the lower court.
  2. 2 Whether the application for release of funds should have been filed in the lower court file CMCC No. 276 of 2018.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the application for release of funds was improperly before it, as the funds were deposited in the lower court file CMCC No. 276 of 2018 following a consent between the parties. The present miscellaneous application was only for leave to appeal out of time, and not the substantive appeal or the lower court file. Therefore, the High Court in this miscellaneous application lacked jurisdiction to order the release of the funds. The proper procedure required the applicant to file the application in the lower court file where the deposit was made. Consequently, the application was dismissed as being misplaced.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 5.3.2024 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.