[2018] KEELRC 2383 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2383 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant is unemployed and without benefits, a fact not rebutted by the respondent. Given the applicant's financial incapacity and the absence of evidence from the respondent showing otherwise, the court exercised its discretion to allow payment of the decretal sum by monthly installments....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2383 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jillor Alexi Kasse; Respondent: East African College of Opthalmologists
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1153 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Installment Payment of Costs
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Costs Liquidation, Stay of Execution, Instalment Payments
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Costs Liquidation Stay of Execution Instalment Payments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jillor Alexi Kasse

Applicant

East African College of Opthalmologists

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Installment Payment of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted a stay of execution of the costs order.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be allowed to liquidate the decretal sum in monthly installments due to unemployment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is unemployed and without benefits, a fact not rebutted by the respondent. Given the applicant's financial incapacity and the absence of evidence from the respondent showing otherwise, the court exercised its discretion to allow payment of the decretal sum by monthly installments. The court determined that an installment of Kshs. 10,000 per month was reasonable under the circumstances, balancing the interests of both parties and ensuring the respondent's right to recover costs while not imposing undue hardship on the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The applicant shall pay the decretal sum in equal monthly installments of Kshs. 10,000 with effect from 1st March 2018 until payment in full.