[2024] KEELC 5768 (KLR)
The court found that the consent order on costs, duly signed by counsel for both parties, was cogent and merited adoption as the final order of the court. The court was guided by the constitutional principles of alternative dispute resolution and the statutory mandate to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 5768 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jinat Investments Limited; Defendant: County Government Of Migori; Defendant: Chief Office Lands, Housing and Physical Planning
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 85 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Consent Order and Costs
- Outcome
- Suit marked as settled by consent; consent order on costs adopted as final order of the court.
- Judges
- GMA Ongondo
- Legal Topics
- Consent Orders, Party to Party Costs, Settlement of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jinat Investments Limited
Plaintiff
County Government Of Migori
Defendant
Chief Office Lands, Housing and Physical Planning
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Consent Order and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent order on costs between the parties should be adopted as the final order of the court.
- 2 Whether the agreed party to party costs are enforceable as per the consent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the consent order on costs, duly signed by counsel for both parties, was cogent and merited adoption as the final order of the court. The court was guided by the constitutional principles of alternative dispute resolution and the statutory mandate to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate, and accessible resolution of disputes. The consent, having been freely entered into and addressing all issues in dispute, was adopted as the order of the court, thereby settling the matter in full.
Court Disposition
Suit marked as settled by consent; consent order on costs adopted as final order of the court.
Orders
- The consent order on costs dated 22nd June 2024 is adopted as the order of the court.
- Party to party costs of KES 4,000,000 payable to the 1st defendant’s counsel within 21 days, failing which execution to issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Jinat Investments Limited v County Government of Migori & another (Environment & Land Case 85 of 2017) [2024] KEELC 5768 (KLR) (24 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 5768 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Migori
Environment & Land Case 85 of 2017
GMA Ongondo, J
July 24, 2024
Between
Jinat Investments Limited
Plaintiff
and
The County Government Of Migori
1st Defendant
Chief Office Lands, Housing and Physical Planning
2nd Defendant
Ruling
1. Mr Mwita Kerario learned counsel for the plaintiff and Mr Nyamori Nyasimi learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd defendants have implored this court to adopt the consent order on costs dated 22nd June 2024 between the parties as the ruling and final order of this court in settlement of their dispute in this suit.
2. By the said consent duly signed by counsel for the respective parties, party to party costs have been agreed at Kshs. 4, 000, 000/= (Kenya shillings four million only) payable to the 1st defendant’s counsel, Nyamori Nyasimi and Company Advocates within the next 21 days from this date failure of which execution to issue herein.
3. Upon hearing counsel for the respective parties and being guided by Article 159 (2) (b) , (c) and ( e) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and section 20 of the Environment and Land Court Act 2015 (2011), I find the consent cogent and merited.
4. A fortiori, the consent is hereby adopted as the order of this court and this matter is marked as settled accordingly.
5. It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT HOMA BAY THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY 2024. GEORGE M. A. ONGONDOJUDGEIn the presence of’Mr Mwita Kerario learned counsel for the plaintiffMr Nyamori Nyasimi learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd defendantsTom Maurice court assistant