[2009] KEHC 2270 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner's evidence of cruelty and misconduct by the respondent was credible and unchallenged, meeting the required standard of proof for dissolution of marriage. The respondent's failure to contest or provide evidence left the petitioner's case uncontroverted. The court was satisfied that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 2270 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: JMM; Respondent: RNM
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 183 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- KH Rawal
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Cruelty, Matrimonial Offences, Custody and Welfare, Irretrievable Breakdown
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JMM
Petitioner
RNM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's conduct amounted to cruelty justifying dissolution of marriage.
- 2 Whether the petitioner proved the grounds for divorce as required by law.
- 3 Whether the petitioner condoned or colluded in the acts complained of.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner's evidence of cruelty and misconduct by the respondent was credible and unchallenged, meeting the required standard of proof for dissolution of marriage. The respondent's failure to contest or provide evidence left the petitioner's case uncontroverted. The court was satisfied that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to the respondent's conduct, and that the petitioner had not condoned or colluded in the acts complained of. Accordingly, the court granted a decree nisi for dissolution of the marriage, to be made absolute within 90 days.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- A decree nisi of dissolution of marriage between the parties is issued.
- The decree nisi shall be made absolute within 90 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Divorce Cause 183 of 2006
JMM ……………………………… PETITIONER
VERSUS
RNM……………………………. RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The parties before the court were married under monogamous system of marriage on 11th February, 2000 but prior to that they had undergone ceremony of marriage under their customary law.
They both are Kenya citizens as well as residents of Kenya. The cohabited as man and wife in Nairobi at two places upto 2004.
The marriage was graced with birth of two children namely:-
(a)SK born on 30th May, 1996
(b)RM born on 29th September,1999.
The Petitioner/husband adduced evidence before the court. He had based his prayer for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty which are very vividly specified in paragraph 7 of his petition. I may not elaborate them. But in brief he claimed that the Respondent has been physically and verbally abusive; has spent numerous weekends in bars in company of strange men; slept on numerous weekend out of matrimonial home having traveled out of Nairobi in the company of strange men; and he added that she has been having intimate or improper relation with several men. These actions of the Respondent exposed the Petitioner to loneliness, severe humiliation and emotional pain and trauma.
It is further averred and affirmed that the Respondent used to come home drunk at the early hours of the morning and would cause commotion by hurling abuses at the Petitioner and causing damages to his utter embarrassment and trauma. The Respondent also used to take away children of the marriage from matrimonial home without ensuring their security, welfare and comfort. In April, 2005 the children were taken away in similar fashion and then she left them at the mercy and mistreatment of her relatives, when she abandoned them while leaving the country. The Respondent has according to the Petitioner showed total lack of love, affection or consideration during their married life.
Since their separation in the year 2004, they have not cohabited and as per the Petitioner their marriage has been irretrievably broken down. He denied that he has condoned or been accessory to the acts of cruelty by the Respondent and that he has presented or prosecuted the petition in collusion with the Respondent.
The Respondent was present during the hearing along with her counsel and opted not to question the petition and also to adduce any evidence.
In the premises, the testimony of the Petitioner remained uncontroverted. I had observed demeanour of the Petitioner and thus shall rely on his evidence which I find to be credible.
The Petitioner has thus proved his case as per the standard of proof in matrimonial causes and I am satisfied further that he has fulfilled the provisions of Section 10 of the Matrimonial Causes Act (cap 152).
In the premises aforesaid, I direct that the decree nisi of dissolution of marriage solemnized between the parties be issued. This Decree Nisi be made absolute within 90 days.
I do not make any orders on cost.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi, this 3rd day of July, 2009.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE
3. 7.09