[2022] KEHC 12695 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant failed to provide a proper affidavit of means or any documentary evidence to substantiate his claim of inability to pay the maintenance ordered by the trial court. The court emphasized that the best interests of the children are paramount and that suspending maintenance would not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 12695 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: JNK; Respondent: HWN
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E079 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Maintenance Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application for stay dismissed with costs; appeal to be heard expeditiously
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Child Maintenance, Best Interests of Child, Stay of Orders, Affidavit of Means
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JNK
Appellant
HWN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Maintenance Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has provided sufficient grounds for stay of the maintenance order pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the best interests of the children would be served by granting a stay of the maintenance order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant failed to provide a proper affidavit of means or any documentary evidence to substantiate his claim of inability to pay the maintenance ordered by the trial court. The court emphasized that the best interests of the children are paramount and that suspending maintenance would not serve those interests, especially where parentage is not in dispute. The court relied on constitutional and case law principles that stay of maintenance orders should only be granted in rare circumstances, and that an expedited hearing of the appeal is preferable to suspending maintenance. Consequently, the application for stay was declined.
Court Disposition
application for stay dismissed with costs; appeal to be heard expeditiously
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 7th May, 2021 is dismissed with costs.
- The appeal shall be heard expeditiously.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
JNK v HWN (Civil Appeal E079 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 12695 (KLR) (23 June 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 12695 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Civil Appeal E079 of 2021
MM Kasango, J
June 23, 2022
Between
JNK
Appellant
and
HWN
Respondent
(An appeal against the Ruling and Order of the Senior Principal Magistrate’s court at Limuru (C.N. Mugo, SRM) delivered on 20th April, 2021)
Ruling
1. This appeal is directed at Limuru, SPM Magistrate’s Court’s decision in children’s case No. 30 of 2020. The appellant (father of the children) is aggrieved by the order requiring him to produce monthly maintenance for the children of the marriage at Kshs.15,000/= per month. The father depend in the affidavit in support and in his supplementary affidavit that he has continued to pay for the education of the children. That his business has faired badly due to COVID 19 pandemic and he is unable to meet the amount ordered by the trial court. The father was sought by Notice of Motion application dated 7th May, stay of that order of maintenance pending the hearing and determination of this appeal.
2. The mother of the children, the respondent in the appeal deponed in her affidavit in response to the application that the father had defaulted in the payment of the maintenance and as at September, 2021 was in arrears of Kshs.75,000.
3. Although the father seeks stay on the basis that he is unable to pay the amount ordered by the trial court, he did not before this Court, nor in the trial court provide an affidavit of means. When I say there was no affidavit of means, I mean that it ought to be more than casual statements of the father that the rental income is so much and the income of transport is so much. One would expect such deposition to be supported by documents. None were provided by the father.
4. Article 53 of the Constitution requires the court to treat the best interest of the child as of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child. The father has failed to show how the stay of maintenance will be in the best interest of the children of the family. In this regard, see the case of MNN V. MOK & another(2017) eKLR thus:-“…it is in very rare cases that courts grant stay of maintenance orders in cases involving minor children, where the duty to maintain a child is imposed on a parent by statute, as it is not in the best interests of the child to suspend a maintenance order particularly where parentage is not in dispute and that an expedited hearing of the main appeal might be a solution where there is a challenge on quantum of maintenance rather than staying the orders of the trial court pending appeal.
5. With the above in mind and because no material has been placed before court by the appellant to persuade the court stay order is in the interest of the children, the application is declined.
Disposition 6. The Notice of Motion dated 7th May, 2021 for reasons set above are dismissed with costs. I direct this being a children’s matter that this appeal be heard expeditiously.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU THIS 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2022. MARY KASANGOJUDGECoram:Court Assistant : MouriceFor Appellant: - Ms NjorogeFor Respondent :- Present in personRuling delivered virtually.MARY KASANGOJUDGE