[2002] KECA 230 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 230 (KLR)

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the application by the applicant and ordered that the respondent be awarded the costs of the application. The withdrawal was accepted without objection, and the standard principle that costs follow the event was applied.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 230 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joackim Mwandale Okessa; Respondent: Judith Guserwa
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 387 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Execution Order Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application withdrawn with costs to the respondent.
Legal Topics
Execution Pending Appeal, Withdrawal of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Execution Pending Appeal Withdrawal of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joackim Mwandale Okessa

Applicant

Judith Guserwa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Execution Order Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for execution order pending appeal should proceed or be withdrawn.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the application by the applicant and ordered that the respondent be awarded the costs of the application. The withdrawal was accepted without objection, and the standard principle that costs follow the event was applied.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • The application is withdrawn.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the respondent.