[2017] KEELRC 374 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 374 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent for 7 months without a written contract, and was terminated without notice, hearing, or reasons, contrary to the mandatory provisions of the Employment Act. The respondent failed to appear or defend the claim, and the evidence showed the claimant was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 374 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joan Nanyama Kukesi; Respondent: Jungle Dove Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2380 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Notice Pay, Service Pay, Leave Entitlement, Statutory Deductions, Compensation for Unlawful Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Notice Pay Service Pay Leave Entitlement Statutory Deductions Compensation for Unlawful Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joan Nanyama Kukesi

Claimant

Jungle Dove Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment contrary to the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to notice pay, leave, service pay, compensation, and statutory deductions.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to follow due process in terminating the claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent for 7 months without a written contract, and was terminated without notice, hearing, or reasons, contrary to the mandatory provisions of the Employment Act. The respondent failed to appear or defend the claim, and the evidence showed the claimant was entitled to notice pay, prorated leave, and compensation for unfair termination. The claim for service pay for 6.3 years was rejected as unfounded, and statutory deductions were directed to be handled by the County Labour Officer. The court held that the respondent's failure to follow statutory procedure rendered the termination unfair, warranting compensation equivalent to...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.36,000 as compensation for unfair termination.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.12,000 as notice pay.