[2019] KEELC 2127 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2127 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised in the preliminary objection could not be determined without calling for evidence, particularly regarding the Plaintiff's possession and the circumstances of the alleged purchase. The court noted that the pleadings and affidavit evidence were insufficient to resolve the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2127 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joanes Ondego Oywech; Defendant: Alex Omondi Ogolla
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 23 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Judges
TM Olando
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Succession Disputes, Land Registration, Preliminary Objection, Overriding Interests
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Succession Disputes Land Registration Preliminary Objection Overriding Interests

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joanes Ondego Oywech

Plaintiff

Alex Omondi Ogolla

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the preliminary objection raises pure points of law that can be determined without evidence.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff's claim is barred by previous succession proceedings or criminal cases.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff's entry and possession of the land was in contravention of the Land Control Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised in the preliminary objection could not be determined without calling for evidence, particularly regarding the Plaintiff's possession and the circumstances of the alleged purchase. The court noted that the pleadings and affidavit evidence were insufficient to resolve the parties' rights to the land at this stage. Furthermore, the court held that the Plaintiff was not barred from pursuing a claim based on adverse possession or overriding interests, even though the land had been subject to succession proceedings. As such, the preliminary objection did not raise pure points of law and was without merit. The suit should proceed to hearing for...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection by the Defendant is rejected and dismissed with costs.